[Cesg-all] Results of Recent CESG Poll

Oliver, Brian (HQ-CG000)[Arctic Slope Technical Services, Inc.] brian.oliver at nasa.gov
Thu Jan 4 02:26:57 UTC 2018


CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2017-10-001 Approval of SC14 and SC13/CCSDS Information Exchange for Reference Architecture Extensions

Results of CESG poll beginning 26 October 2017 and ending 4 December 2017:

Abstain:  0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally:  2 (40%) (Burleigh, Shames)
Approve with Conditions:  3 (60%) (Calzolari, Barkley, Merri)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Mario Merri (Approve with Conditions):
The text of the resolution is not very clear and requires explanations. In particular: 
1. It is stated that "TC20/SC14 and the CCSDS liaison have reviewed this proposal ... to be sent for approval": who specifically has done this? 

2. The text implies that the joint SC13/SC14 reference architecture shall be created, maintained and evolved. On CCSDS side, something is being done to cover the CCSDS side. Is the same being done on SC14 side? Timescale? 

3. How will the joint architecture be described? Using the current approach adopted by CCSDS that is based on power point/document? 

4. What is the approach to harmonise the SC14 and SC13 reference architectures? What resources are required and where do they come from? 

5. Similarly, once the harmonised architecture exits, what resources are required to maintain it and evolve it and who will pay for this? 

6. Is the joint reference architecture meant to be an overall roadmap for SC13 and SC14, thus indicating completed, in progress and future work? 

7. What will be the governance of the harmonised architecture?

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions):
​I concur with the conditions expressed by MOIMS AD. It would be good discussing the matter CESG wide in a meeting/webex.

Eric Barkley (Approve with Conditions):
A minor editorial condition:  Suggest replacing "they" in the last sentence of the resolution to "TSO/SC14 and SC13/CCSDS" (assuming this is who is meant by "they').

Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20180104/c5bea3f3/attachment.html>


More information about the CESG-All mailing list