[Cesg-all] Mailing Lists to CCSDS CWE Login Mappings

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Nestor,
        is it (or is it going to be) mandatory to have a CWE login to be 
in a CCSDS mailing list?

Gian Paolo

PS looking quickly the SLS part I saw some names that for sure have 
eventually got a CWE login.



From:   Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
To:     "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG All" 
<cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   02/11/2017 11:57
Subject:        [Cesg-all] Mailing Lists to CCSDS CWE Login Mappings
Sent by:        "CESG-All" <cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>



Dear all 

Please find attached the results of the mailing lists to CCSDS CWE Login 
Mappings (per Area, and within the Area per WG). Each e-mail in the 
attachment is not mapped to a CCSDS CWE Login. 

This was executed by the Secretariat IT Support (Brian Oliver) following a 
manual and tedious process.   

Summary 
525/1239 = 42% of E-Mail Addresses in CCSDS Working Groups do not 
correspond to a CCSDS CWE Login. 
1.      SEA - 31/87 = 35% of SEA Mailing Lists Members do not have CWE 
Logins 
2.      MOIMS - 240/405 = 59% of MOIMS Mailing Lists Members do not have 
CWE Logins 
3.      CSS - 3/46 = 6% of CSS Mailing Lists Members do not have CWE 
Logins 
4.      SOIS - 99/161 = 61% of SOIS Mailing Lists Members do not have CWE 
Logins 
5.      SLS - 70/304 = 23% of SLS Mailing Lists Members do not have CWE 
Logins 
6.      SIS - 82/236 = 34% of SIS Mailing Lists Members do not have CWE 
Logins
The Secretariat cannot make logins for these e-mail addresses, because it 
is required that all CWE Users request a login.  When a user requests a 
login, there is an approval process, and the users profile is created. 
There is not enough information from an e-mail address to create a user 
profile or CWE login. 
Some users in the attached lists may have had CWE accounts in the past. In 
March 2017, all users who has not logged into the CWE in the previous 12 
months were not assigned new CWE Logins when the CWE was migrated to ASRC 
Servers. 
 
Please discuss this in your WG and report to your AD. CESG will discuss 
the findings at its meeting on 10th November 2017. 
  
  

ciao 
nestor
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee 
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete 
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the 
sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

[attachment "SISMailmantoCWE.rtf" deleted by Gian Paolo 
Calzolari/esoc/ESA] [attachment "SLSMailmantoCWE.rtf" deleted by Gian 
Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] [attachment "SOISMailmantoCWE.rtf" deleted by 
Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] [attachment "CSSMailmantoCWE.rtf" deleted 
by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] [attachment "MOIMSMailmantoCWE.rtf" 
deleted by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] [attachment 
"SEAMailmantoCWE.rtf" deleted by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] 
_______________________________________________
CESG-All mailing list
CESG-All at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20171102/8368e447/attachment.html>