[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2017-02-003

[CCSDS Secretariat]

Dear CESG Members,

The single conditional approval vote for approval 
to release CCSDS 523.2-R-1 is qualified with the 
statement, "I think this does not need to stall 
the rest of the review and this item can be 
treated along with any others raised during 
agency review." Therefore, upon forwarding the 
PID to the working group, the Secretariat will 
consider the condition to be resolved and proceed to CMC polling.

At 01:56 PM 3/5/2017, CCSDS Secretariat wrote:
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-02-003 
>Approval to release CCSDS 523.2-R-1, Mission 
>Operations Message Abstraction Layer—C++ API 
>(Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Results of CESG poll beginning 18 February 2017 and ending 3 March 2017:
>
>                  Abstain:  1 (14.29%) (Calzolari)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (71.43%) (Giulio, 
> Merri, Behal, Burleigh, Wilmot)
>  Approve with Conditions:  1 (14.29%) (Shames)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>
>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This 
>document contains a huge amount of detail and it 
>was not possible to review it all in depth. That 
>said I did check a number of topics and found no 
>glaring errors. The document appears to have 
>been carefully constructed and well documented. 
>The one identified issue relates to the SANA 
>registry, and a PID for that is attached. I 
>think this does not need to stall the rest of 
>the review and this item can be treated along 
>with any others raised during agency review.
>
>Gian Paolo Calzolari (Abstain): Editorial comments:
>
>Ref. [3], [4], [B1] are listed but never called in the document.
>
>Ref. [2] is only called in section 1.1 (non 
>normative) so it should be informative reference.
>
>
>Total Respondents: 7
>All Areas responded to this question.
>
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll
>