[Cesg-all] Result of recent CMC Polls

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2014-01-001 
Authorization to release CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, 
Organization and Processes for the Consultative 
Committee for Space Data Systems (Yellow Book, Issue 4) and related documents

Results of CMC poll beginning 31 January 2014 and ending 24 February 2014:

                 ADOPT:  5 (55.56%) (CNSA, CSA, INPE, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  4 (44.44%) (CNES, DLR, ESA, JAXA)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      CNES:  - In section 2.3.2.4.4, it is not 
clear if the voting rule in CESG is "one man one 
vote" ("DADs invited to vote in CESG") or "one 
vote per area" ("DAD having right to vote instead 
the AD") or a combination ("DAD having no voice 
if there is a disagreement between AD and DAD"). 
A clarification is welcome and should also 
clarify the voting rights of the CESG chair and 
deputy, to whom same rules should apply. Also the 
quorum in the CESG should be clearly stated as 
based on 1+6 or 2+12 votings rights. Having said 
that, I think the easiest is "one man one vote" and the 2+12 voting rights.
- In same section, even if the previous comment 
is not agreed, correct the typo after the third occurence of "DAD".
- in § 5.2.9, is the French "au dessous" correct in international English ?
- in § 5.3.5.1 the CMC email adress should read 
with small case on "cmc-exec" ... or otherwise, 
the cesg one should read "CESG at ...".
      DLR:  its not quite clear for DLR how to 
handle the concurrent poll in CMC and CESG. A lot 
of comment on the A02.1-Y-3.4 are not solved with the ongoing CMC poll.
For my comments, I have to state, that all of 
them are included as decided during our last meeting.
      ESA:  Regarding section 6.2.6.2 Waivers, 
and the implementation of the accepted ESA 1 comment on the document,

ESA considers that while the request for 
inclusion of an ICS waiver procedure has been 
satisfied in this issue of the document, the 
procedure involving CMC/CESG levels is too heavy 
and recommends to delegate the granting of an ICS waiver to the AD
      JAXA:  (a) Date of document issue is January 2014, not January 2013
(b) Concerning the RID JAXA1, after hearing the 
explanation about "2.3.1.4.5 Stakeholder 
Relations" at CMC held in Montreal, it  seems 
like that the "Customer Relations" in the Figure 
2-1 is substantially equivalent in the meaning as 
"Stakeholder Relations" . Should this 
understanding be correct, "Customer Relations" in 
the Figure 2-1 may be changed as "Stakeholder Relations".
However, this subject is related to the RID CNES8 
regarding the scope of customer requirements, 
therefore we understand that this depends on 
disposition result of the RID CNES8.


Results are based on responses from 9 out of 11 members (81.82%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:
Inferred Secretariat Action:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2014-02-001 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 414.0-G-2, 
Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Green Book, Issue 2)

Results of CMC poll beginning 1 February 2014 and ending 17 February 2014:

                 ADOPT:  10 (100%) (ASI, CNES, 
CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2014-02-001
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2014-02-002 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 
414.1-B-2,  Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Blue Book, Issue 2)

Results of CMC poll beginning 1 February 2014 and ending 17 February 2014:

                 ADOPT:  10 (100%) (ASI, CNES, 
CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2014-02-002
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2014-02-003 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 
521.1-B-1,  Mission Operations Common Object Model (Blue Book, Issue 1)

Results of CMC poll beginning 1 February 2014 and ending 17 February 2014:

                 ADOPT:  10 (100%) (ASI, CNES, 
CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2014-02-003
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2014-02-004 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 
651.1-B-1,  Producer-Archive Interface 
Specification (PAIS) (Blue Book, Issue 1)

Results of CMC poll beginning 1 February 2014 and ending 17 February 2014:

                 ADOPT:  10 (100%) (ASI, CNES, 
CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2014-02-004
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *