[Secretariat] [Cesg-all] CCSDS Org & Proc Yellow Book: MOIMS Comments + CESG Chair comments

[Thomas Gannett]

Nestor:

Sorry--I put together the draft CCSDS ICS spec as a dumbed-down (and 
cost-free) version of the ISO ICS spec.  I thought everyone was aware of that.

I'm not married to it.  If the CESG wants everyone to follow the ISO 
ICS spec, that's fine with me. But making sure everyone has a copy of 
the ISO spec is another matter.

Best regards,
Tom

At 10:14 AM 10/3/2013, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int wrote:
>Tom
>
>I am not putting under discussion the spirit of the decisions taken 
>at CESG / CMC level. You are misunderstanding my message.
>
>There will be an ICS, but needs more in-depth discussions.
>
>A new YB is now introduced, and decisions were taken without the YB 
>on the table. So, we need to evaluate and discuss it
>
>Otherwise it appears that the editor of the YBs have the power to 
>decide what to include or not. The power lies with CESG / CMC and 
>nowhere else.
>
>In a nutshell,
>    * there will be an ICS
>    * additional discussions are needed
>    * your assumed schedule does not work anymore
>    * As CESG Chair I do not agree to start a CMC poll for the 
> updated Procedure YB and the "new out of the oven" ICS YB
>
>An additional question:
>
>Who is the ICS editor ?
>
>ciao
>nestor
>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the 
>addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, 
>dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content 
>is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please 
>notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be 
>altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20131003/520ed300/attachment-0001.htm