[Cesg-all] CMC Comments to projects baseline

[John Garrett]

Hi Nestor,

In regards to this comment:

CNES comments on MOIMS area:
- Data Entity Dictionary Specificaton Language (DEDSL) - XML Schema : CNES is 
said to have editor+prototype responsibility on this project while we are not 
aware of a new activity there and it was decided at the last CMC not to conduct a 
maintenance of this and other DAI documents ; To be clarified.

There has been a misunderstanding that the DAI documents were not being 
maintained and used.
In fact the DAI document re-affirmations were "Approved with Comments".  We are 
addressing the comments, but we fully desire and expect that all DAI documents 
will be re-affirmed.
Also CNES is the primary user of the DEDSL and EAST standards in several projects 
and they are continuing active development of the software projects (e.g. BEST & 
SIPAD) that are based on these standards.

In regards to this comment:
Due to a very recent reduction of the ESA 2013 standardisation budget, an 
adjustment of the allocations to the different areas, including CCSDS projects is 
underway. Therefore ESA cannot confirm at this moment the resources refected in 
the CCSDS Management Framework in their entirety. ESA can thus only provisionally 
confirm the resources and approve the programme of work contained in CWE.
In particular the ESA resources for the following projects need to be re-confirmed:
...
Producer-Archive Interface Specification (PAIS) ESA(P2)
...

We have confirmed with the contractor that they are being funded for this work by 
ESA.



Peace and may the odds be with you,
-JOhn




On 4/17/2013 5:41 PM, Berry, David S (3920) wrote:
>
> Hi Nestor:
>
> With regards to the following comment:
>
> - Conjunction Data Message : CNES among other agencies have supported the 
> prototyping of the CDM, which is not reflected, but is confirmed for remaining 
> activities. To be formalized, if needed.
>
> The Framework resources data collection supports entries for 2 prototypes.  In 
> the case of the conjunction data messages, we had 5 organizations that 
> developed prototypes that produce CDMs (JSpOC, Space Data Association (SDA), 
> CNES, ESA/ESAC, and JPL).  I picked 2 of them, the two major providers of 
> conjunction assessments in today's market, JSpOC and SDA, neither of which is 
> an agency.  This is why the Framework reflects "Other" for both prototype 
> entries.  There was no intent to slight CNES or any other CCSDS Member Agency.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
>
>
>
> From: "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int <mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>" 
> <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int <mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>>
> Date: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:01 AM
> To: "cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org <mailto:cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>" 
> <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org <mailto:cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>>
> Subject: [Cesg-all] CMC Comments to projects baseline
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please look at the CMC comments issued on the Project baseline poll and give 
> feedback to your AD. Every Area shall come to the CESG meeting on Friday 19th 
> April with conclusions on how to respond to the CMC
>
> ciao
> nestor
> ================================
>
> *DLR comments*
> I have discussed with every WG on the affected Projects
>
> *CNES comments on MOIMS area:*
> - Data Entity Dictionary Specificaton Language (DEDSL) - XML Schema : CNES is 
> said to have editor+prototype responsibility on this project while we are not 
> aware of a new activity there and it was decided at the last CMC not to conduct 
> a maintenance of this and other DAI documents ; To be clarified.
> - Conjunction Data Message : CNES among other agencies have supported the 
> prototyping of the CDM, which is not reflected, but is confirmed for remaining 
> activities. To be formalized, if needed.
>
> *CNSA comments in general*
> CNSA encourages our engineers to make more contributions to the corresponding 
> WG. Recently several engineers of CNSA already contacted to the WG Chair and 
> conformed their participation level. The present  " Projects - Resource View " 
> table does not reflect the CNSA participation status yet. But this does not 
> affect the decision for the WG continuing due to CNSA participation levels are 
> limited to "contribute" and "monitor" now. However CNSA would hope the Projects 
> - Resource View could be updated in the future to reflect CNSA participation 
> status.
>
> *ESA comments for several areas*
> Due to a very recent reduction of the ESA 2013 standardisation budget, an 
> adjustment of the allocations to the different areas, including CCSDS projects 
> is underway. Therefore ESA cannot confirm at this moment the resources refected 
> in the CCSDS Management Framework in their entirety. ESA can thus only 
> provisionally confirm the resources and approve the programme of work contained 
> in CWE.
> In particular the ESA resources for the following projects need to be 
> re-confirmed:
> CCSDS Symmetric Key Management Recommendations ESA(L)
> Producer-Archive Interface Specification (PAIS) ESA(P2)
> Improved Coding Schemes for the Proximity Link ESA(L)
> Space Data Link Security Concept of Operation, Issue 1 ESA(L)
> Space Data Link Security Concept of Operation, Issue 2 ESA(L)
> SOIS-WIR Low data-rate wireless communications for spacecraft monitoring and 
> control  ESA(L)
> XML Specification for Electronic Data Sheets for Onboard Devices, ESA (LP)
> Common Dictionary of Terms  ESA (P)
> Also the currently greyed items (not approved) cannot be confirmed.
> For all other items, the effort alocation indicated in the CWE is confirmed by ESA.
>
> *NASA comments on CSS and SOIS Areas*
> NASA confirms that our current plan is to provide the resources that are 
> documented as "NASA-provided" in the current resource plan, with two 
> exceptions.  NASA will "adopt" this resolution after those changes are made in 
> the Framework.
> (1) For the “Framework for Extensible Space Communication Cross Support Service 
> Management” in CSSM, remove NASA from the prototype, and replace it with TBD. 
>  NASA does not have resources assigned to this, and the WG chair said that 
> these prototypes were actually TBD.
> (2) For the “SOIS-WIR High data-rate wireless communications for spacecraft 
> monitoring and control” in the Wireless WG, our understanding is that the 
> document is planned to be cancelled.  Coordinate with the WG chair and either 
> cancel that document, or at least remove NASA from the resources list for 
> support to that project.
> With those changes, NASA agrees to provide the resources that NASA is signed up 
> for.  Also, NASA agrees that the current resource plan for all projects looks 
> acceptable.  We understand that some documents have TBD for some resources 
> still, but those will be discused and decided on at the next meeting.
>
> ciao
> nestor
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20130418/b08a021a/attachment.html