[Cesg-all] CMC-P-2006-06-007: Publication of SM&C GB issue 2

Nestor.Peccia at esa.int Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Tue Aug 29 03:04:02 EDT 2006


Dear all,

please find enclosed the MOIMS SM&C WG responses to the DLR comments.

These responses have already been cross-checked with DLR.

I propose to include this point in the next CMC meeting, such to seek
approval for the publication of the SM&C GB Issue 2.

CMC poll is also shown below for the sake of completeness.

ciao
nestor



============================================================================================
RESPONSE TO GB COMMENTS

   Comment - check Document control on consistency


   Proposed Response - Document Control section shall be updated


   Comment - is a ground system performance not forseen (2.2.1)?


   Proposed Response - Second bullet point of section 2.2.1 shall be updated
   to include Ground System.


   Comment - should the spacecraft software management an autonomous process
   with no interactions to other processes in the spacecraft?


   Proposed Response - Figure 2 and Figure 6 do not show interactions between
   software management  and other processes as how the actual software
   management is implemented is not considered to be part of the service. A
   note will be added to clarify.


============================================================================================


CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2006-06-007: Authorization to publish Mission
Operations Services Concept Informational
Report (CCSDS 520.0-G-2)

Results of CMC poll beginning 29 June 2006 and ending 11 August 2006:

ADOPT: 8 (88.89%) (ASI, BNSC, CNES, CSA, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 1 (11.11%) (DLR)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)
DLR:
      check Document control on consistency
      is a ground system performance not forseen (2.2.1)?
      should the spcacraft software management an autonomous process with no
      interactions to other processes in  the spacecraft?
Results are based on responses from 9 out of 10 members (90%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Pending Disposition of Provisions

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *





More information about the CESG-all mailing list