[Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for April 2006

Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int
Thu Apr 20 12:43:05 EDT 2006


Oliver,
I cannot agree with your report below.
CCSDS 350.1-G-1 was submitted to CMC without CESG approval; CESG review was
completed 14 April:

CCSDS 350.1-G-1  has been approved conditionally by SIS and SLS and only
after the 'conditions' are resolved will it be possible to submit it to CMC
for final approval.
I take the CMC voting is void.

best regards
Jean-Luc Gerner
TEC-ETN
Tel: +31 71 565 4473


                                                                             
             "Oliver Brian                                                   
             (BTAS)"                                                         
             <brian.oliver at btas                                           To 
             .com>                      cmc at mailman.ccsds.org,               
             Sent by:                   cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org           
             cesg-all-bounces at m                                           cc 
             ailman.ccsds.org           "Tom Gannett (CCSDS Sub Contr)"      
                                        <tom.gannett at btas.com>               
                                                                     Subject 
             20/04/2006 17:48           [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for      
                                        April 2006                           
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             




CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-R-2006-03-006: Green Book approval of Security
Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS 350.1-G-1
Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Release Document

The CMC,

CONSIDERING that the Security Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS
350.0.1-G-1 has previously been submitted for CESG review
(CESG-R-2005-08-005) and was not approved;

and ACKNOWLEDGING that the issues concerning the disapproval have been
resolved;

and RECOGNIZING that Green Books require concurrent approval from the CESG;

RESOLVES that Security Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS 350.0.1-G-1 be
published as an Issue-1 Informational Report.

Results of CMC poll beginning 3 March 2006 and ending 14 April 2006:

ADOPT:  3 (100%) (ASI, CNES, INPE)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
REJECT:  0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 3 out of 10 members (30%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

BNSC
CSA
DLR
ESA
FSA
JAXA
NASA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-A-2006-03-001: Request for Data Compression
Requirements


Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Action Completed
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Interpret Requirements


Agencies are requested to provide their data compression requirements (e.g.,
hyper-/multi-spectral, radar signal, etc.) for future missions that could be
developed by the SLS Data Compression WG into CCSDS Recommended Standards.

Results of CMC poll beginning 3 March 2006 and ending 14 April 2006:

Agency has no requirements at this time:  2 (50%) (INPE, JAXA)
Agency has the following future data compression requirements:  2 (50%) (ASI,
CNES)


ASI - ASI is interested in data compression for hyper/multi-spectral and SAR
data.
CNES - At CNES level, we may be interested in developing within CCSDS
framework a solution for hyper and multi-spectral images compression.  This
assumes that the charter of the WG is revised or a new BOF is created.

Results are based on responses from 4 out of 10 members (40%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:
BNSC
CSA
DLR
ESA
FSA
NASA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 _______________________________________________
CESG-all mailing list
CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all





More information about the CESG-all mailing list