[Moims-dai] Reminder of call today

david at giaretta.org david at giaretta.org
Tue Feb 13 08:05:24 UTC 2024


Meeting: 10:00 Tuesday (Washington DC time), 1500 UK time, 1600 Paris time. 

 

If you do not receive a notification from Skype then please join it by
clicking the link: https://join.skype.com/ykyu5SIPhSnD

 

*Don't have Skype yet? Download it before you join  <https://www.skype.com>
https://www.skype.com

 

 

Draft agenda:

1.	Apologies
2.	Review of agenda
3.	New attendees?
4.	CCSDS/ISO workflow progress -

a.	ISO comments are at
http://review.oais.info/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__
<http://review.oais.info/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&list_id=3393&order=
bug_id&product=OAIS%20June%202012&query_format=specific>
&list_id=3393&order=bug_id&product=OAIS%20June%202012&query_format=specific
- please take a look and add your comments. Many are very simple and can be
agreed quickly I hope. But this discussion may take most of the meeting

 

At the last meeting on 6th Feb we agreed:

*	374 - agreed with suggestion
*	365 - agreed with suggestion - need to update diagram
*	362 - agreed with suggestion - need to update diagram
*	368 - need clean up of wording. DG suggests the following see
http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=368

*	From:

The degree to which Content Information and its associated PDI conveys
information to a Designated Community is, in general, quite subjective.
Nevertheless, it is essential that an Archive make this determination in
order to maximize information preservation. 

 

*	To:

The degree to which Content Information and its associated PDI conveys
information to a Designated Community could be quite subjective.
Nevertheless, it is essential that an Archive make this determination in
order to maximize information preservation. Therefore, as described in
detail in section 2.4, Preservation Objectives allow a more objective
determination to be made.

*	369 - need cleaned up wording. DG suggests - see
http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=369

*	From: 

"A deletion policy should gather information about the deletion (i.e., what,
why, who)."

 

*	To: 

"A deletion policy should gather information about the deletion (i.e., what,
why, who). The policy may, for example, specify that an audit trail of
actions on an AIP must be kept."

 

*	This keeps things in line with "policy"

 

*	355 - the WG asked DG to look back at why the sentence was deleted
see http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=355

*	I've looked back at the various draft versions of OAIS.
*	It looks like the removal of that phrase was not the result of a
particular RID, but rather a tidy-up because the point is made in the body
of the document.

 

*	Therefore I see no harm in agreeing with the suggested change.

 

*	370 - agree to NO CHANGE - needs agreement with submitter
*	384 - no option but to agree
*	366 - agreed with suggestion
*	381 - must check with submitter:

*	Agree but change "optimal" to "possible"

 

*	Also

"high degrees of inter-operability" to "greater interoperability"

*	359 - must ask for clarification
*	358 - DG suggests: see http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=358

How about:

*	From:

"To summarize, 1.6.2, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.3 are normative and form the basis of
conformance to this Recommended Practice."

 

*	To:

"To summarize, to be conformant with OAIS an Archive must support the basic
terminology specified in section 1.6.2, and must be able to map its
practices to the OAIS Information Model which is defined at very high level
in section 2.3 and in more detail in section 4.3, and must also fulfill the
Mandatory Responsibilities specified in section 3.2."

 

I did not hear any disagreements . I have marked the appropriate items as
closed and hope to close 368, 369, 358, 355

 

5.	OAIS-IF - if there is time

a.	draft BB - see
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/f7tinvugkzae6btcwggc9/OAIS-IF-Core-Specificat
ion-v8.doc?rlkey=5hvkvpwujb1dly2rwt4yj7pkn
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/f7tinvugkzae6btcwggc9/OAIS-IF-Core-Specifica
tion-v8.doc?rlkey=5hvkvpwujb1dly2rwt4yj7pkn&dl=0> &dl=0 

(i)                  what REST commands should we have e.g. getInfoObject,
GetDataObject, GetRepInfo, GetPDI etc

b.	Making the APIs consistent between the draft BB and MB.
c.	Updated GB draft is
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/odc8i4uda23v4fx60ksju/OAIS-IF-Rationale-Scena
rios-and-Requirements-20230914.docx?rlkey=8jhmvvv52kkstvpuis4tb7f6d
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/odc8i4uda23v4fx60ksju/OAIS-IF-Rationale-Scen
arios-and-Requirements-20230914.docx?rlkey=8jhmvvv52kkstvpuis4tb7f6d&dl=0>
&dl=0. There is an expanded discussion of RepInfo in section 9.
d.	Steve's latest draft Magenta book is available at
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ydy1vkbal4idj18wur2f8/02_White_Book_Recommend
ed_Standard_OAIS-IF_Draft_221017_v5.3-06_CCSDS_230828_Magenta_Description_CL
CE.pdf.docx?rlkey=1elmlj5zd5bbg0lq59yrde9ng
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ydy1vkbal4idj18wur2f8/02_White_Book_Recommen
ded_Standard_OAIS-IF_Draft_221017_v5.3-06_CCSDS_230828_Magenta_Description_C
LCE.pdf.docx?rlkey=1elmlj5zd5bbg0lq59yrde9ng&dl=0> &dl=0  - he may be
sending an update.
e.	Draft Yellow Book
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/4fkjciqf7klmn0p/OAIS-IF%20Interoperability%20Test
%20Plan%20202303.docx?dl=0> - Roberta 

Regards

 

..David

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20240213/1f70f8c4/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the MOIMS-DAI mailing list