[cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Wed Jan 15 18:27:51 UTC 2025

Okay, technically, not the "latest CWE" but rather a much later version of SharePoint.  Sorry for any confusion.

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) via SMWG
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 10:25
To: Phil Crump <phil.crump at goonhilly.org>; hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com
Cc: smwg at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Hi Hugh,

I think Phil is correct. In case you missed it, back in the last week of December, the CCSDS techsupport staff sent out a message about having upgraded to the latest CWE. As part of that, we are now all required to deal with 2 factor authentication for logging in.   Hopefully you received instructions for the new login procedure (should have been in your inbox somewhere on or after December 27, I think). Please let me know if you did not get those instructions.

Best regards,
-Erik

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Phil Crump via SMWG
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 09:55
To: hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com<mailto:hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com>
Cc: smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Hi Hugh,

You need to log in to it with your "@spacecomm.com" login from the new CWE, not your own microsoft login. You may need to open the link in an 'Incognito'/'Private' window to achieve this without explicitly logging out of your own microsoft account first.

A consequence of everyone using now microsoft, but every organisation managing logins themselves (because it's easiest for the sysadmins that way.)

Cheers,
Phil Crump
Deep Space Communications Engineer
+44 (0)7523 802 137
[cid:image001.png at 01DB6738.14647900]
________________________________
From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> on behalf of hugh.kelliher--- via SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Sent: 15 January 2025 17:26
To: 'Barkley, Erik J (US 3970)' <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>; 'EXTERNAL-Unal, Martin P (9110-Affiliate)' <Martin.Unal at esa.int<mailto:Martin.Unal at esa.int>>; 'CCSDS Service Management W/G' <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Hi Erik,

I get the following error message when I click on the link:

Request Id: 26e6aba3-72d1-4e8d-8400-d6a9e9450f00

Correlation Id: b6d277a1-20c5-7000-9c2d-a0925002ba35

Timestamp: 2025-01-15T17:24:17Z

Message: AADSTS90071: An admin from Agile Decision Sciences must update their access settings to accept inbound multifactor authentication.

Does anyone else have this problem or is it just me?

Regards,

Hugh

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) via SMWG
Sent: 15 January 2025 02:03
To: EXTERNAL-Unal, Martin P (9110-Affiliate) <Martin.Unal at esa.int<mailto:Martin.Unal at esa.int>>; CCSDS Service Management W/G <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

CSSM Colleagues,

I have added a few comments to the draft BRP book. Given the new capabilities of the upgraded CWE, I have taken the liberty of placing a working copy in the CWE and then editing directly via SharePoint online. The working copy can be found via:  https://spacecomm.sharepoint.com/sites/CSS/Shared%20Documents/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Magenta/Best%20Practices/White%20Book/Drafts/902x11w01-BPR-20241220-WorkingDraft.docx?d=w1ffde3be0c07403190468bf2088c6352<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/spacecomm.sharepoint.com/sites/CSS/Shared*20Documents/CSS-SM/CWE*20Private/Book*20Production/Magenta/Best*20Practices/White*20Book/Drafts/902x11w01-BPR-20241220-WorkingDraft.docx?d=w1ffde3be0c07403190468bf2088c6352__;JSUlJSU!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!JlXUGl4BsuMgPW7-Empsm8VkXnTRAbICXHcFbdlHEDRTw97XGezgef7zwVUNDJ0sexLrDredVrTCHhR7qwPp2nmxEg$>

This copy also includes the comments that were added by Martin Unal.   We will discuss making the best use of the new SharePoint capabilities at the upcoming teleconference (now scheduled for January 28). In the meantime, I'd like to request that if you want to provide comments that you please do so via the working copy in SharePoint/CWE. I think that ultimately this can cut down on having to download and upload files and manually merge, etc.

Best regards,

-Erik

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Martin Unal via SMWG
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 06:12
To: CCSDS Service Management W/G <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Hello

I have added few comments in the document.

I join a summary table I have created to track the field amongs various product.

  *   The definition of Version is problematic. The implementation cost to populate the field has defined is used. For no benefit.

The description shall be changed to be a recommandation only

  *   SMURF update/delete

Reference to the mission agreement can cause inconsitency between request.

  *   Service type and parameter.

I expect lots of discrepancy between implementations here. Two fields can convey information on that regards

  *   serviceAgreementRef                                                    Used by ESTRACK to define service type (e.g. DDOR, TTC)
  *   <onlineSrvPkgType1Details configurationProfileRef         Used by ESTRACK to define service parameter (e.g. TM_RATE)

Shall we include a recommandation on how to cover that topic ? But we would have to agree on one.

Or we highlight the fact this aspect is out of the “simple SMURF” and shall be covered by bilateral agreement.

Happy new year to all. 😊

Regards
________________________________________
Martin UNAL
Ground Operation Engineer
Ground Facilities Ops HSO - ONO
H-376
ESOC
Robert-Bosch Strasse 5
64 293 Darmstadt
Germany
Tel +49 6151 90 2959
________________________________________

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Colin Haddow via SMWG
Sent: 20 December 2024 19:10
To: CCSDS Service Management W/G <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE

Dear all,

               as a special Christmas present for the W/G (especially Martin)  I've just uploaded the initial draft of the Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial to CWE, this will give you something to do over the long boring Christmas holidays (🙂 🙂 🙂). This is a zip file containing the Word document and XML examples along with the required schemas to validate the examples. This can be found at the following URL;

  *   902x11-BPR W/G Pack: https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Magenta/Best%20Practices/White%20Book/Drafts/902x11w01-BPR-20241220-CRH_WG_Pack.zip<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE*20Private/Book*20Production/Magenta/Best*20Practices/White*20Book/Drafts/902x11w01-BPR-20241220-CRH_WG_Pack.zip__;JSUlJQ!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!N46rRkc-bcv6zLP9GB8U1vqd4Ao_yc1EtLdV6peRlmU_86X8r1QYIa42byZYEskNsQC57Ql7OiefAjDxaGRv2oYfNw$>

In addition I've created a GitHub release with the UML models and XML examples and schemas. This can be found at the following URL;

  *   902x11-BPR GitHub release: https://github.com/CCSDS-CSSM/902Repository/releases/tag/WG_Release-20241220<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/github.com/CCSDS-CSSM/902Repository/releases/tag/WG_Release-20241220__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!N46rRkc-bcv6zLP9GB8U1vqd4Ao_yc1EtLdV6peRlmU_86X8r1QYIa42byZYEskNsQC57Ql7OiefAjDxaGR6l_LgGQ$>

I'd appreciate any feedback, especially from Martin and Phil as they're already effectively using the precursor to SM Level-0 operationally.

Merry Christmas 🎅🎄❄️🎁& A Happy New Year 🎆🎇🍾to One & All

Colin

Dr. Colin R. Haddow

Scotty Consulting UG

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).

[https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!JlXUGl4BsuMgPW7-Empsm8VkXnTRAbICXHcFbdlHEDRTw97XGezgef7zwVUNDJ0sexLrDredVrTCHhR7qwP4dxXr2A$>
Virus-free.www.avast.com<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!JlXUGl4BsuMgPW7-Empsm8VkXnTRAbICXHcFbdlHEDRTw97XGezgef7zwVUNDJ0sexLrDredVrTCHhR7qwP4dxXr2A$>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20250115/c4c7d475/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 63007 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20250115/c4c7d475/attachment-0001.png>