[cssm] Agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats

Wed Feb 8 19:09:43 UTC 2023

Just before I closed the window with the diagram on my laptop I noticed that the parent class is called "SevicePkgReq" - I think this should be "ServicePkgReq".    Perhaps we should file a RID? Just to make sure Tom sees that all is tracked properly? I hope this is it re "nuisance-but-you-have-to-deal-with-it" class updates.

Best regards,
-Erik

From: Colin Haddow <Scotty.Consulting at outlook.de> On Behalf Of Colin Haddow
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 7:40
To: Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>; EXTERNAL-Unal, Martin P (9110-Affiliate) <Martin.Unal at esa.int>; Marcin Gnat via SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats

Well spotted Erik, I've added a note to the response to RID 7 to remind me about it.

Cheers for now,

Colin

Dr. Colin R. Haddow

Scotty Consulting UG

________________________________
From: Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Sent: 08 February 2023 02:55
To: EXTERNAL-Unal, Martin P (9110-Affiliate) <Martin.Unal at esa.int<mailto:Martin.Unal at esa.int>>; Colin Haddow <Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com<mailto:Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com>>; Marcin Gnat via SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: RE: Agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats

One more note on this:

The intro to the diagram says "The UML diagram in figure 3-7 shows the subset of classes that are applicable to the Delete Service Package Request, Delete Service Package, Replace Service Package and Set Active Scenario."

I think the last four words need to be deleted.  I recall that we accepted a RID that pointed out that scenario was still being discussed (elsewhere) in the draft and agreed to "purge" the scenario verbiage in the book in general but just in case this gets overlooked I thought I would point it out.

Best regards,

-Erik

From: Martin Unal <Martin.Unal at esa.int<mailto:Martin.Unal at esa.int>>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 8:16
To: Colin Haddow <Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com<mailto:Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com>>; Marcin Gnat via SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>; Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats

Hello

Concerning RID-11, I don't understand the disposition:

Agreed: Remove srvPkgID from ServicePkgReq class and move it to DeleteSrvPkgReq class, the serviceReqID is not needed in the ReplaceSrvPkg and DeleteSrvPkg classes

For ReplaceSrvPkg and DeleteSrvPkg, we need to have reference to both

- requester ID (serviceReqID)

- provider ID (srvPkgRef)

This essential to synchronise both party DB.

The RID was about the fact that current implementation allow to link one [requester ID] to multiple [provider ID] in the DeleteSrvPkg.

Regards
________________________________________
Martin UNAL
Ground Operation Manager
Ground Facilities Ops HSO - ONO
H-376
ESOC
Robert-Bosch Strasse 5
64 293 Darmstadt
Germany
Tel +49 6151 90 2959
________________________________________

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Colin Haddow via SMWG
Sent: 25 January 2023 22:03
To: CCSDS Service Mgmt WG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: [cssm] Agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats

Dear all,

               the agreed W/G RID responses (as of 2023/01/25) for Agency Review of CCSDS 902.9-R-1 Service Management Utilization Request Formats can be found at the following URL;

https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Blue/Service%20Management%20Utilization%20Request%20Format/Red%20Book/Agency%20Review/Agency%20Review%20RIDs/902x09r1%20-%20Service%20Management%20Utilization%20Request%20Formats%20-%20Agreed%20WG%20RID%20Responses%2020230125.pdf<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fcwe.ccsds.org*2Fcss*2Fdocs*2FCSS-SM*2FCWE*2520Private*2FBook*2520Production*2FBlue*2FService*2520Management*2520Utilization*2520Request*2520Format*2FRed*2520Book*2FAgency*2520Review*2FAgency*2520Review*2520RIDs*2F902x09r1*2520-*2520Service*2520Management*2520Utilization*2520Request*2520Formats*2520-*2520Agreed*2520WG*2520RID*2520Responses*252020230125.pdf&data=05*7C01*7CMartin.Unal*40esa.int*7Cc15ff5a517554e4bc5e908daff17976a*7C9a5cacd02bef4dd7ac5c7ebe1f54f495*7C0*7C0*7C638102774032539417*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C3000*7C*7C*7C&sdata=Fp1hDkV2gVL1lANkrm0iSIxoejtkLs*2BLKe5RuXbop7Q*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!elKnnH4qduMkfb_flr6d-2Gwpi3IKnsnPv2XwAtdckK6iSPDRpeHNVMUThfa-k16S7hnPxH3bQ$>

The intention is that we finalise these responses at the next W/G telecon on Feb 7th. With this in mind please review the responses and (ideally) send any comments you may have to myself, Marcin and Erik before the telecon.

Thanks.

Cheers for now,

Dr. Colin R. Haddow

Scotty Consulting UG

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20230208/99c7419c/attachment-0001.htm>