[cssm] [EXTERNAL] Re: Use of SICF in service management

Tue Feb 23 19:07:53 UTC 2021

Colin,

I think Hugh is correct.  If you have RAF and RCF and FCLTU for a given tracking pass that means 3 SICFs for that tracking pass.  Presumably if we had MD-CSTS there would the be (some other) form of configuration file needed not to mention TD-CSTS.  To diverge a bit, I think this tends to confirm we really want, ultimately, the SPDF + SCAP to be the mechanism for conveying this kind of information.

-Erik

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Hugh Kelliher
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:36
To: Colin.Haddow at esa.int; smwg at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cssm] Use of SICF in service management

Hi Colin,

I believe there is one SICF per service type per pass. An example I have for RAF and F-CLTU is:

[SERVICE INSTANCE]
SERVICE_TYPE = R-AF
ID = [{3 2 229}QNTQ-Tabatha:CPX01-Doce-(2)][{3 2 236}1][{4 2 37}1][{4 2 41}1][{3 2 181}1][{3 2 183}1] PEER_ID = West Freugh GS
PORT_ID = 172.26.16.9:5008
START_YEAR = 2002
START_MONTH = 2
START_DAY = 19
START_HOUR = 12
START_MIN = 51
STOP_YEAR = 2002
STOP_MONTH = 2
STOP_DAY = 19
STOP_HOUR = 12
STOP_MIN = 54
TIME_OUT = 10
DELIVERY_MODE = TimelyOnline
LATENCY_LIMIT = 1
TRANSFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1
ALLOWED_FRAME_QUALITY = AllFrames
INITIAL_PRODUCTION_STATUS = configured
INITIAL_FRAME_SYNC_LOCK = Unknown
INITIAL_CARRIER_DEMOD_LOCK = Unknown
INITIAL_SUBCARRIER_DEMOD_LOCK = Unknown
INITIAL_SYMBOL_SYNC_LOCK = Unknown

SERVICE INSTANCE]
SERVICE_TYPE = F-CLTU
ID = [{3 2 229}QNTQ-Tabatha:CPX01-Doce-(2)][{3 2 236}1][{4 2 14}1][{4 2 18}1][{3 2 97}1][{3 2 72}1] PEER_ID = West Freugh GS
PORT_ID = 172.26.16.9:5008
START_YEAR = 2002
START_MONTH = 2
START_DAY = 19
START_HOUR = 12
START_MIN = 52
STOP_YEAR = 2002
STOP_MONTH = 2
STOP_DAY = 19
STOP_HOUR = 12
STOP_MIN = 55
TIME_OUT = 10
MAX_SLDU_LENGTH = 144
MOD_FREQUENCY = 8
MAX_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
DATA_RATE = 1000.0
MOD_INDEX = 1.1
INIT_PROD_STATUS = configured
BITLOCK_REQ = true
RF_AVAIL_REQ = 1
PLOP = plop2
INIT_UPLINK_STATUS = false

Cheers,
Hugh

From: SMWG [mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Colin.Haddow at esa.int<mailto:Colin.Haddow at esa.int>
Sent: 23 February 2021 18:03
To: smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [cssm] Use of SICF in service managemnt

Dear all,
                  just working thro' what using the SICF means for the SMURF and SPDF, if my memory serves me correctly there should be one and only one SICF used during a pass. This being the case it would imply that per service package there would be at most one SICF referenced. Also I think that the SICF would be needed for Offline Services.

Are these valid assumptions ?

Cheers for now,

Colin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Colin R. Haddow,
HSO-GI, European Space Agency,
European Space Operations Centre,
Robert-Bosch-Str 5,
64293 Darmstadt,
Germany.

Phone; +49 6151 90 2896
Fax;      +49 6151 90 3010
E-Mail;  colin.haddow at esa.int<mailto:colin.haddow at esa.int>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or

protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received

this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect

personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20210223/5296158c/attachment.htm>