[Smwg] AI2018-0411014: Update Ref-Framework diagram and add to Interrecommendation...
Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-LCN0)[MTI SYSTEMS, INC.]
wesley.m.eddy at nasa.gov
Tue Oct 9 01:45:39 UTC 2018
Just as a datapoint, I will say that In the SN, scheduling of playbacks is a way to make sure that offline services don't impact simultaneous online services sharing the bandwidth of the ground network WAN links. That network capacity is treated as a resource by the scheduling system. There are potentially other ground resources that could have capacity constraints (e.g. I/O bandwidth of a disk array, etc) which might make it preferable to schedule offline services in some cases ... Though I would agree that it does seem counter-intuitive, and there are possibly other decent ways to deal with preventing impact to online services..
From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Barkley, Erik J (3970)
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:30 PM
To: Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de; smwg at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Smwg] AI2018-0411014: Update Ref-Framework diagram and add to Interrecommendation...
Hello Marcin,
I think we have an additional item for the Berlin meetings - double check the updated reference framework. I have included this on the agenda for Thursday morning of the meeting week.
Re your questions:
1) "- The Service Package has no reference to the Service Agreement (possibly it should have)" Yes, I think it should. And perhaps this is something to consider as optional in the common information entities magenta book. No doubt more discussion at the meetings in Berlin.
2) - "Simple Schedule does not include at the moment Offline Service Package, or?". My preference would be to keep the off-line service packages out of the simple schedule definition. The rationale being that the notion of an off-line service package is frankly rather archaic by today's standards (the SSF is really about who is utilizing which aperture and not who is scheduling access to an archive - really I have to schedule access to an archive?). I believe that if an implementation really needs to note that data retrieval/off-line service packages are scheduled that can be accommodated by adding an appropriate implementation unique extension parameter or parameters but I don't think there is really a widely supported business case here. Perhaps yet more discussion in Berlin :)
Best regards,
-Erik
From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de<mailto:Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 04:46
To: smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [Smwg] AI2018-0411014: Update Ref-Framework diagram and add to Interrecommendation...
Dear All,
I worked out new FW-references. This is something one calls major rework, I suppose.
Should fit to the current status of our Information Entities. There are two points which came to me when doing:
- The Service Package has no reference to the Service Agreement (possibly it should have)
- Simple Schedule does not include at the moment Offline Service Package, or?
Aside, I used some coloring, to group the entities (grey - offline, orange/red - online related, blue - planning and green reporting).
Please have a look at the updated diagram below:
[cid:image001.png at 01D45F50.3690AAE0]
Also I have uploaded new Interrecommendation Worksheet (which btw. includes newest State Machines as well):
https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Administration/Inter%20Recommendation/InterRecommdation%20Tracker-27-September-2018.xlsx
The Visio File for the Model itself:
https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Administration/Inter%20Recommendation/Models/Referential%20FW%20Information%20Model/F5-1_InfoEntitiesReferenceFramework-180927.vsd
Best regards
Marcin Gnat
--------------------------
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR)
German Aerospace Center
Space Operations and Astronaut Training | German Space Operations Center (GSOC) | Communications and Ground Stations
Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Wessling, Germany
Marcin Gnat | Team Leader Ground Data Systems
Telephone +49 (8153) 28 3201 | Telefax +49 (8153) 28 1456 | marcin.gnat at dlr.de<mailto:marcin.gnat at dlr.de>
www.DLR.de<http://www.dlr.de/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20181009/5b033a01/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28603 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20181009/5b033a01/attachment.png>
More information about the SMWG
mailing list