[Smwg] ESA Review of PIF

[Colin.Haddow at esa.int]

Dear all,
                  we've just completed the ESA review of the current draft 
of Planning Information Formats events and have identified the following 
points and questions.

It would be useful to add the OWLT as an optional parameter to all events
It would be useful to add the elevation angle as a mandatory parameter to 
the FwdComsStartEvent, RetComsStartEvent ,FwdComsEndEvent and 
RetComsEndEvent events (JP would this cause any problems with respect to 
TDRS ?)
KeyholeEvent should be split into 2, KeyholeStart and KeyholeEnd
Question; should OWLT or RTLT be used ?
Question: How should comms events be handled for Rovers, e.g. define the 
relay spacecraft (or Rover) as an aperture or define specific events for 
Rover visibility or any other ideas ?

Anyway these can be used as input to the PIF discussion in San Antonio.

Cheers for now,

Colin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Colin R. Haddow,
HSO-GI, European Space Agency,
European Space Operations Centre,
Robert-Bosch-Str 5,
64293 Darmstadt,
Germany.

Phone; +49 6151 90 2896
Fax;      +49 6151 90 3010
E-Mail;  colin.haddow at esa.int
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20170503/2aaa0f18/attachment.html>