[Smwg] [Cesg-all] Notes of the CESG meeting on 15th May 2017

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Also has the advantage of sorting properly.  The one proposed in the minutes was tossed out during the CESG meeting.

I like Anthony's approach.  And gee, it IS standard.  ;-}    It even aligns with the CCSDS Time Code spec, 301x0:

3.5.1.1 ASCII TIME CODE A, Month/Day of Month Calendar Variation:
The format for ASCII Time Code A is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.d→dZ

Reference (2) in the CCSDS spec is ISO 8601:2004 


Good catch.

-p


From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> on behalf of Anthony Crowson <anthony.crowson at telespazio-vega.de>
Date: Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 11:47 AM
To: Erik Barkley <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Smwg] [Cesg-all] Notes of the CESG meeting on 15th May 2017

Thank you.

With respect to the bullet on time format (or rather, date) – is there a good reason why CESG would want to avoid the ISO format e.g. 2018-08-12? Not just unambiguous but standard…

Anthony

From: SMWG [mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Barkley, Erik J (3970)
Sent: 01 June 2017 20:20
To: CCSDS Service Mgmt WG
Subject: [Smwg] FW: [Cesg-all] Notes of the CESG meeting on 15th May 2017

CSSM Colleagues,

For your reading pleasure, attached please find the notes from the May 15th CESG meeting.  These have been approved for distribution by the CESG Chair.

Best regards,
-Erik



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20170601/185714d8/attachment.html>