[SLS] CCSDS Strategic Plan: Future Work for SLS Area

Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Fri Oct 12 13:14:52 UTC 2018


Enrico,
        I checked the SLS Reports from last meeting and the Fall 2017 
Report says:

RFM WG Executive Summary......  ACM book discussed with C&S WG: agreement 
that no further book needed
C&S Executive Summary .......           ACM book discussed with RFM WG: 
agreement that no further book needed
Finally we reported about ACM in slide for C&S Issues for CESG / CMC (see 
below)

Then the conclusion is......................

Ciao

Gian Paolo




From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Cc:     "SLS - Space Link Services Area" <sls at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   12-10-18 15:04
Subject:        Re: [SLS]  CCSDS Strategic Plan: Future Work for SLS Area


I think it was more a C&S WG task to which RFM WG would provide support. 
Therefore, you need to check with C&S WG if this is still in the charter 
and have the view of its chair.

Enrico




From:   Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
To:     "SLS - Space Link Services Area" <sls at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   12/10/2018 14:56
Subject:        [SLS]  CCSDS Strategic Plan: Future Work for SLS Area
Sent by:        "SLS" <sls-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>



Dear All, 
        here attached a snapshot about what is currently in the CCSDS 
Strategic Plan about Future Work for SLS Area. 
See https://cwe.ccsds.org/fm/sp/default.aspx for the complete plan 

First of all, please let me know if there are items to be added (as Draft 
Projects) . 

Sopecific Questions: 

RFM + C&S I guess we should delete ACM project. Correct?? 
SDLS: I think that SDLS Extended Procedures Green Book has replaced the 
update of 350.5. Correct? can we delete it? 
OPT: orward links seem to be already considered in current HPE book. Shall 
we delete this draft project? 
OPT: I understand that the two projects (or at lest one) will start if 
there is consensus on O3K. Correct? Should we change the title to refer to 
O3K instead of LC? 

Thank you all for the collaboration and best regards 

Gian Paolo 





This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may 
contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or 
dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies 
appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA 
Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

_______________________________________________
SLS mailing list
SLS at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sls




This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls/attachments/20181012/412c91a7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 42691 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls/attachments/20181012/412c91a7/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 44143 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls/attachments/20181012/412c91a7/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the SLS mailing list