[Sls-slp] RE: UC Polling SLP WG for USLP Red-1 Transition

[Kazz, Greg J (312B)]

Matt,
I agree with your approach.
Best regards,
Greg

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 11, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Cosby Matthew <MCOSBY at qinetiq.com> wrote:
> 
> Greg,
> 
> We are currently in the middle of our review - which will not finish in time for your deadline. To prevent delay, I propose that we go to RED-1 - and any results from our review are presented as RIDS? 
> 
> Please confirm if you are happy with this approach?
> 
> Cheers, Matt.
> 
> Matthew Cosby
> Chief Engineer, QinetiQ Space UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1252 396313
> email: mcosby at QinetiQ.com
> www.QinetiQ.com
> QinetiQ - Delivering customer-focused solutions 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Edward (312B)
> Sent: 10 May 2016 03:41
> To: Kazz, Greg J (312B); sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
> Subject: [Sls-slp] RE: Polling SLP WG for USLP Red-1 Transition
> 
> The specification is of satisfactory quality for me.  I therefore vote to go Red-1.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Kazz, Greg J (312B)
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:48 PM
> To: sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
> Subject: [Sls-slp] Polling SLP WG for USLP Red-1 Transition
> 
> Dear SLP WG Members,
> By now I believe there has been ample time to review and compare the latest USLP White book dated April 26 with previous redlined versions.
> So now I ask you to email me and the SLP distribution list to let us know if this April 26 version is good enough i.e., of sufficient quality to go to Red-1 status. By good enough I mean certainly not perfect but on the other hand not having so many errors that the RID process would overwhelm us.
> 
> If we obtain consensus, I will ask our area director to generate a resolution to the CESG/CMC for approval to Red-1. Then I will work with Tom Gannett to turn the book around in time so that an Agency review can take place with the goal of concluding it before the Rome meeting.
> 
> Please respond by or before May 13
> 
> Best Regards,
> Greg Kazz
> Chairman SLP WG
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> Sls-slp mailing list
> Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sls-slp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sls-slp mailing list
> Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sls-slp
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
> you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor 
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may 
> monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for 
> the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England
> & Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology 
> Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX  http://www.qinetiq.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sls-slp mailing list
> Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sls-slp