UC Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 DataLink Specification for final SLP WG review

Kazz, Greg J (313B) greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Sep 19 16:31:50 UTC 2013


Tom,

I know the goal was to try and publish the Prox-1 PICS before the Fall meeting. But on the other hand, it would be good to go through them as a WG to ensure we are all on the same page with them for compelteness across the board.

Gian Paolo – are we obligated to publish the PICS (and therefore all three Prox-1 books) before the Oct. meeting, or can we wait until after?

I'd like for the WG in person to have one more look at it at the Fall meeting.

By the way, please send out your official copy of all the draft Prox-1 PICS to us, so that we make sure we are all in sync.

Thanks!

Greg
------------------------------------------------------
Greg Kazz
EEISE Group Supervisor
Systems Engineering Section (Section 313)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena  CA 91109
MS 301-490
(818) 393-6529 (office)
------------------------------------------------------

From: Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM
To: "Kazz, Greg J (313B)" <greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov>>, Cosby Matthew <MCOSBY at qinetiq.com<mailto:MCOSBY at qinetiq.com>>, "Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>, "sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>" <sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: UC Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 DataLink Specification for final SLP WG review

Greg:

That would push publication of the Proximity books into late November or December (or later).  Did the review reveal issues that can't be resolved without a face-to-face meeting?

Tom

At 11:46 AM 9/19/2013, Kazz, Greg J (313B) wrote:
Matt,

Got it.
I also need to add the Proximity-1 Space Data Link PICS Proforma discussion to the SLP WG Agenda.

Regards,

Greg
------------------------------------------------------
Greg Kazz
EEISE Group Supervisor

Systems Engineering Section (Section 313)

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena  CA 91109

MS 301-490

(818) 393-6529 (office)
------------------------------------------------------

From: Cosby Matthew <MCOSBY at qinetiq.com<mailto:MCOSBY at qinetiq.com>>
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2013 2:06 AM
To: " Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" < Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>, "Kazz, Greg J (313B)" <greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov> >
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>, " sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>" < sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: RE: UC Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 DataLink Specification for final SLP WG review

Greg,

I agree with Gian Paolo on his points on section 5.4.

I think we should have:

- DLL-64 / 5.4.2.4        Mandatory if DLL-62 Supported

Tom will need to advise on how we represent that.

I would also suggest that we delete: (notional)

Hope to see you all in Texas.

Cheers, Matt.

Matthew Cosby
Chief Engineer, QinetiQ Space UK
Tel: +44 (0)1252 396313
email: mcosby at QinetiQ.com<mailto:mcosby at QinetiQ.com>
www.QinetiQ.com<http://www.qinetiq.com/>
QinetiQ - Delivering customer-focused solutions
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> [ mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
Sent: 04 September 2013 09:16
To: Kazz, Greg J (313B)
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat; sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 DataLink Specification for final SLP WG review

Greg,
        Just about DLL-1.
DLL-1 should be removed if it refer to section 3.2.
Making DLL-1 to refer to 3.2.1 (instead of 3.2) makes the second comment superseded.

I am not sure I agree about your view of section 5.4 and I would rather use "conditional items" also because as far as I see this is the only case (i.e. no big burden implied). However we can go Pink with the present form (except the corrections you agreed) and discuss the matter in San Antonio to generate RIDs (if needed).

One more comment: DLL-60 says "Time Correlation Process (notional)".
The term notional is mentioned only once in the document (i.e. here).
Should its meaning in PICS context be clarified (or alternatively deleted)?

Ciao

Gian Paolo

From:
"Kazz, Greg J (313B)" <greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov> >
To:
" Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" < Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>, " sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>" < sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc:
CCSDS Secretariat <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>
Date:
03/09/2013 22:58
Subject:
Re: Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 Data Link        Specification for final SLP WG review
Sent by:
sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>





G.P.

Thanks for your comments!

My answers are in **…. ** below.

------------------------------------------------------
Greg Kazz
EEISE Group Supervisor
Systems Engineering Section (Section 313)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena  CA 91109
MS 301-490
(818) 393-6529 (office)

------------------------------------------------------

From: " Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" < Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>
Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:59 AM
To: "Kazz, Greg J (313B)" <greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov> >
Subject: Quick comments for PICS: [Sls-slp] Proximity-1 Data Link Specification for final SLP WG review

A few very quick comments.
Of course there may be more for similar cases.

regards

Gian Paolo
----------------------------------------------------

A2.2 PICS
Should DLL-1 better refer to 3.2.1 instead of 3.2?
** Yes 3.2.1 **

DLL-1 should be removed as individual subsections of 3.2 are addressed and moreover DLL-1 as it stands now is incorrect/confusing as it includes also options?
** We need users to comply with both 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. The subparts of 3.2.2. are useful to see because they contain valid values associated with these parameters. **

Why the description of Option 1 is with lower case o (i.e. o.1 instead of O.1 as in the table)? ** I think it was a typo. It was corrected as all capital letters in my version **
Why DLL-61 is in bold?   (this is not the only one in bold...) ** I think this is Tom's way of showing a heading. **

Is it correct to mark all the items within e.g. 5.4 as optional? ** Yes that was deliberately done by the WG **
If you read section 5.4, it contains mandatory requirements and options.
This was actually a case for conditional items as follows:
- DLL-63 / 5.4.2.1        Optional
- DLL-64 / 5.4.2.4        Mandatory if DLL-62 Supported
Is it correct giving up about conditional items in PICS? ** In this case, yes **

Moreover
DLL-61 / 5.4 should not be listed as the individual requirements are listed
DLL-63 should refer to 5.4.2.1 and not to 5.4.2 ** I agree, DLL-63 refers to 5.4.2.1 **
As section 5.4 is written, it is not visible that this feature is optional ==> should 5.4.1 be made optional? **yes **

PICS take - as expected - several pages.
Why not shortening some cases as e.g. DLL-52 / 5.2 ?
In other words why not having only a row for DLL-52 and removing the 8 following rows?
Alternatively why not indenting the following 8 row and using identifiers as DLL-52.x?
** Up to Tom Gannett how best to deal with indexing or showing subsets of information within the PICS **
** We could shorten the DLL PICS, however I tried to strike a compromise between the shortest PICS Proforma possible vs conveying some redundancy that helps the user check through the items by listing the key ones in detail. If I hide too much information, people might have the tendency to forget about it. Explicitly listing it (but not regurgatating the entire text) seemed to be the best compromise **

**Thoughts from other SLP WG members ??? **



From:
"Kazz, Greg J (313B)" <greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov> >
To:
" sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>" < sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc:
Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>
Date:
20/08/2013 00:14
Subject:
[Sls-slp] Proximity-1 Data Link Specification for final SLP WG        review
Sent by:
sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>






Dear SLP WG members,

Tom Gannett has provided us now with a pre-approval version for the CESG of the Proximity-1 Space Data Link Protocol.

Please review the attached documents and send me and Tom any comments you have (redlines of the clean version would work, if you have the bandwidth to send a 20 Megabyte file !) to me and Tom by Sept. 13.

There are two files in the CWE directory below. One is a red-lined version so that you can see the changes made and also a clean version.

http://tinyurl.com/kzjz38z

Best regards,

Greg
------------------------------------------------------
Greg Kazz
EEISE Group Supervisor
Systems Engineering Section (Section 313)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena  CA 91109
MS 301-490
(818) 393-6529 (office)

------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________
Sls-slp mailing list
Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sls-slp

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Sls-slp mailing list
Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org>
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sls-slp


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is
not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their
integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.







Please consider the environment before printing this
email.

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England & Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com<http://www.qinetiq.com/>

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-slp/attachments/20130919/60f7d548/attachment.html>


More information about the SLS-SLP mailing list