[Sls-slp] Agenda for SLS-SLP WG Meeting at ESTEC Oct 27, 2009
Kazz, Greg J (313B)
greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Sep 25 16:19:20 UTC 2009
I agree we should move forward on the SPP book.
From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:05 AM
To: Kazz, Greg J (313B)
Cc: sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org; sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Sls-slp] Agenda for SLS-SLP WG Meeting at ESTEC Oct 27, 2009
With respect to item 7 on slide 2, namely:
Hold on changes proposed to AOS & TM regarding common terminology for fill/idle frames, CRC pink sheets, APID definition (AOS vs TM/TC) until FSH and Insert Zone Proposal Approved
I think we should decouple the issues; i.e.
1) APID definition only affects SPP and this book should be released ASAP
2) indeed FSH, idle/oid frames etc are affecting the same books and they can be seen in the same pot....
Thank you for considering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SLS-SLP