[Sls-sea-dls] TR: [CESG] FW: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018

Thu May 24 07:48:59 UTC 2018

FYI

Gilles MOURY
CNES Toulouse
De : CESG [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de Thomas Gannett
Envoyé : jeudi 24 mai 2018 00:19
À : cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
Objet : [CESG] FW: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2018-03-004 Approval to release CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol—Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been disposed to the satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize release for Agency review.

Logothete, L.L.C.
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
+1 443 472 0805

From: Burleigh, Scott C (312B) [mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 11:26 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: Barkley, Erik J (3970); 'Moury Gilles'; 'Weiss, Howard'; Daniel.Fischer at esa.int<mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int>
Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018

Thanks, Tom.  Yes, that retires my condition.

Scott

From: Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 8:02 AM
To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B) <scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Cc: Barkley, Erik J (3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>; 'Moury Gilles' <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr<mailto:Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>>; 'Weiss, Howard' <Howard.Weiss at parsons.com<mailto:Howard.Weiss at parsons.com>>; Daniel.Fischer at esa.int<mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int>
Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018

Scott: I will replace all occurrences of shall, must, should, etc., in the annex with suitable non-normative alternative diction. Please advise if that satisfies your condition. –Tom

Logothete, L.L.C.
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
+1 443 472 0805

From: Daniel.Fischer at esa.int<mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int> [mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 10:03 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>; Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>; Moury Gilles; Weiss, Howard
Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018

Dear Tom,

Thanks for the update.

Regarding the comments:

(1) Thanks Tom for solving this one. However, since the Symmetric Key Management Magenta Book is currently undergoing CESG poll as well or at least is under preparation to do so, we could actually already refer to the final Magenta Book instead of the draft Red Book here assuming that the publication would be around the same time. What do you think?

(2) The proposed changes from Scott are OK. The baseline mode is not normative, so the way forward would be to replace the "shall" statements. Please go ahead and replace the "shalls" with the most appropriate terms for non-nromative statements. My suggestion would be to re-phrase the wording in line with the baseline mode of the SDLS core book (Annex E).

Please let me know what you think.

Kind Regards,
Daniel

Dr. Daniel Fischer
Head of the Engineering Support Section, OPS-GES
Ground Systems Engineering Department
Directorate of Operations
ESA - ESOC
Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64392 Darmstadt, Germany
Tel. +49 6151 90 2718 |  E-mail: Daniel.Fischer at esa.int<mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int>

From:        Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>>
To:        Daniel.Fischer at esa.int<mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int>
Cc:        Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>, Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date:        30/04/2018 22:15
Subject:        Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018
________________________________

Hi, Daniel:

The CESG poll to approve CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol--Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) concluded with conditions (see below).

The first comment from Erik Barkley resulted from my blunder: I absently used the (incorrect) document number from the initial draft as the basis for the reference--it should have been CCSDS 354.0-R rather than CCSDS 353.0-R. I have since corrected it. (I have also corrected it in the draft of Symmetric Key Management.)

For the actual condition from Scott Burleigh, if either option he suggests is acceptable, I can make either change quickly and move the book on to CMC polling (providing you identify the change you prefer).

If you prefer to negotiate some other solution with Scott, let me know, and I will forward the current Word file to you.

Best regards,
Tom

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-03-004 Approval to release CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol—Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 March 2018 and ending 23 April 2018:

                Abstain:  0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally:  5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Moury)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (16.67%) (Burleigh)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): A comment only and just to note, in the references there is forthcoming recommendation referenced:
"Symmetric Encryption. Proposed Draft Recommendation for Space Data System
Practices (Proposed Red Book), CCSDS 353.0-R. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS, October
2008."

Is this reference correct? Has this in fact remained proposed for almost 10 years?

Scott Burleigh (Approve with Conditions): Annex D is tagged as Informative, but there are "shall" statements throughout. I think either the "shall" statements should be rewritten or the Annex should be Normative.

Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
+1 443 472 0805

This message is sent for information and/or discussion purposes only.

It shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment for ESA.

It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.

It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content.

Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited.

If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.

ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data.

In case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).

Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-sea-dls/attachments/20180524/e1ab63a8/attachment.html>