From Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr Thu May 24 07:48:59 2018 From: Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr (Moury Gilles) Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 07:48:59 +0000 Subject: [Sls-sea-dls] TR: [CESG] FW: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 In-Reply-To: <001a01d3f2e4$19b03540$4d109fc0$@tgannett.net> References: <5ae77971.1c69fb81.b1f3d.8edc@mx.google.com> <14325_1525269768_5AE9C507_14325_3654_1_OF1AC7E52E.4BC06BCB-ONC1258281.004BD0F8-C1258281.004D286F@esa.int> <001601d3e226$822ba790$8682f6b0$@tgannett.net> <3865e6a8b7ab48be9cfecc4a27971997@jpl.nasa.gov> <001a01d3f2e4$19b03540$4d109fc0$@tgannett.net> Message-ID: <442F062EBF46F247A96B8A50EF3EB6F42E85C961@TW-MBX-P04.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr> FYI Gilles MOURY CNES Toulouse De : CESG [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de Thomas Gannett Envoyé : jeudi 24 mai 2018 00:19 À : cesg at mailman.ccsds.org Objet : [CESG] FW: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 Dear CESG Members, Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2018-03-004 Approval to release CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol—Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been disposed to the satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize release for Agency review. Logothete, L.L.C. thomas.gannett at tgannett.net +1 443 472 0805 From: Burleigh, Scott C (312B) [mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 11:26 AM To: Thomas Gannett Cc: Barkley, Erik J (3970); 'Moury Gilles'; 'Weiss, Howard'; Daniel.Fischer at esa.int Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 Thanks, Tom. Yes, that retires my condition. Scott From: Thomas Gannett > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 8:02 AM To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B) > Cc: Barkley, Erik J (3970) >; 'Moury Gilles' >; 'Weiss, Howard' >; Daniel.Fischer at esa.int Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 Scott: I will replace all occurrences of shall, must, should, etc., in the annex with suitable non-normative alternative diction. Please advise if that satisfies your condition. –Tom Logothete, L.L.C. thomas.gannett at tgannett.net +1 443 472 0805 From: Daniel.Fischer at esa.int [mailto:Daniel.Fischer at esa.int] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 10:03 AM To: Thomas Gannett Cc: Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov; Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov; Moury Gilles; Weiss, Howard Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 Dear Tom, Thanks for the update. Regarding the comments: (1) Thanks Tom for solving this one. However, since the Symmetric Key Management Magenta Book is currently undergoing CESG poll as well or at least is under preparation to do so, we could actually already refer to the final Magenta Book instead of the draft Red Book here assuming that the publication would be around the same time. What do you think? (2) The proposed changes from Scott are OK. The baseline mode is not normative, so the way forward would be to replace the "shall" statements. Please go ahead and replace the "shalls" with the most appropriate terms for non-nromative statements. My suggestion would be to re-phrase the wording in line with the baseline mode of the SDLS core book (Annex E). Please let me know what you think. Kind Regards, Daniel Dr. Daniel Fischer Head of the Engineering Support Section, OPS-GES Ground Systems Engineering Department Directorate of Operations ESA - ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64392 Darmstadt, Germany Tel. +49 6151 90 2718 | E-mail: Daniel.Fischer at esa.int From: Thomas Gannett > To: Daniel.Fischer at esa.int Cc: Scott.C.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov, Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov Date: 30/04/2018 22:15 Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2018 ________________________________ Hi, Daniel: The CESG poll to approve CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol--Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) concluded with conditions (see below). The first comment from Erik Barkley resulted from my blunder: I absently used the (incorrect) document number from the initial draft as the basis for the reference--it should have been CCSDS 354.0-R rather than CCSDS 353.0-R. I have since corrected it. (I have also corrected it in the draft of Symmetric Key Management.) For the actual condition from Scott Burleigh, if either option he suggests is acceptable, I can make either change quickly and move the book on to CMC polling (providing you identify the change you prefer). If you prefer to negotiate some other solution with Scott, let me know, and I will forward the current Word file to you. Best regards, Tom CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-03-004 Approval to release CCSDS 355.1-R-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol—Extended Procedures (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review Results of CESG poll beginning 31 March 2018 and ending 23 April 2018: Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Moury) Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Burleigh) Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%) CONDITIONS/COMMENTS: Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): A comment only and just to note, in the references there is forthcoming recommendation referenced: "Symmetric Encryption. Proposed Draft Recommendation for Space Data System Practices (Proposed Red Book), CCSDS 353.0-R. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS, October 2008." Is this reference correct? Has this in fact remained proposed for almost 10 years? Scott Burleigh (Approve with Conditions): Annex D is tagged as Informative, but there are "shall" statements throughout. I think either the "shall" statements should be rewritten or the Annex should be Normative. Total Respondents: 6 No response was received from the following Area(s): SOIS SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas Gannett thomas.gannett at tgannett.net +1 443 472 0805 This message is sent for information and/or discussion purposes only. It shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment for ESA. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data. In case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int). Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr Fri May 25 16:55:14 2018 From: Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr (Moury Gilles) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:55:14 +0000 Subject: [Sls-sea-dls] MoM of SDLS WG Apr 2018 meeting Message-ID: <442F062EBF46F247A96B8A50EF3EB6F42E85E02C@TW-MBX-P04.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr> Dear SDLS WG member, Please find attached for comments the draft minutes of our April meeting in Gaithersburg : The SDLS Extended Procedures red book is submitted to CMC poll for authorizing Agency Review. The SDLS core protocol green book is to be submitted to CMC poll for publication. Best regards, Gilles Moury SDLS WG chairman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SDLS WG MoM - Apr2018.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 47912 bytes Desc: SDLS WG MoM - Apr2018.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SDLS Apr 2018 MoM attachments.7z Type: application/octet-stream Size: 754314 bytes Desc: SDLS Apr 2018 MoM attachments.7z URL: From Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr Sun May 27 20:09:00 2018 From: Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr (Moury Gilles) Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 20:09:00 +0000 Subject: [Sls-sea-dls] TR: [CESG] CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1) In-Reply-To: <001d01d3f44e$81812fb0$84838f10$@tgannett.net> References: <001d01d3f44e$81812fb0$84838f10$@tgannett.net> Message-ID: <442F062EBF46F247A96B8A50EF3EB6F42E85EDDA@TW-MBX-P04.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr> De : CESG [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de Thomas Gannett Envoyé : vendredi 25 mai 2018 19:34 À : cesg at mailman.ccsds.org Objet : Re: [CESG] CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1) Dear CESG Members, Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1) have been disposed to the satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize publication. From: Barkley, Erik J (3970) [mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:00 PM To: Thomas Gannett Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 Tom, okay, sounds good. Good luck with all the acronyms! -Erik Sent via my phone -------- Original message -------- From: Thomas Gannett > Date: 5/25/18 09:04 (GMT-08:00) To: "Barkley, Erik J (3970)" > Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 Erik: If I get a response on this today (or this morning PDT), the book can go to CMC polling today. Otherwise it will be relegated to the next batch of CMC polls in a couple of weeks. -Tom Logothete, L.L.C. thomas.gannett at tgannett.net +1 443 472 0805 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Gannett [mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 1:34 PM To: 'Barkley, Erik J (3970)' Subject: FW: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 Erik: Concerning your conditions on CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1), Howie and Ignacio have agreed that I should make the proposed changes. Please indicate by return email whether that satisfies your condition. Tom Logothete, L.L.C. thomas.gannett at tgannett.net +1 443 472 0805 -----Original Message----- From: Weiss, Howard [mailto:Howard.Weiss at parsons.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 8:06 AM To: CCSDS Secretariat Subject: Re: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 Tom Ignacio agrees - go ahead and make the changes. Many thanks, howie ________________________________ Howard Weiss, CISSP PARSONS, Inc. 7110 Samuel Morse Drive Columbia, MD 21046 443-430-8089 (office) 443-494-9087 (cell) 443-430-8238 (fax) howard.weiss at parsons.com www.parsons.com Please consider the environment before printing this message ________________________________________ From: CCSDS Secretariat > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 6:29 PM To: Weiss, Howard Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 Howie: I propose simply making the suggested changes myself per the conditions (below) for CESG approval of CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1). Let me know if you are OK with that. Tom >Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:38:59 -0400 >To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org >From: CCSDS Secretariat > >Subject: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 > >CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-05-001 >Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data >Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1) >Results of CESG poll beginning 7 May 2018 and ending 21 May 2018: > > Abstain: 0 (0%) > Approve Unconditionally: 3 (75%) (Shames, Cola, Moury) > Approve with Conditions: 1 (25%) (Barkley) > Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%) > >CONDITIONS/COMMENTS: > >Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): 1) Pg >2-14: From "...cryptographic church key >management.." to "...cryptographic key >management...". Rationale: CCSDS is not in the >business of securing devices to open beer bottles! > >2) Please check for complete popultaion of >acronyms in Annex E: BC is mssing (as in BC >Frames -- whereas TC for TC Frames is >identified). Also, given that COP-1 shows up in >Annex E, why do other abbreviations such as >VC_OCF, MC_FSH not show up in here? > > >Total Respondents: 4 >No response was received from the following Area(s): > >MOIMS >SOIS > >SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions >PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate >CMC poll after conditions have been addressed NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain privileged and confidential information, and information that is protected by, and proprietary to, Parsons Corporation, and is intended solely for the use of the addressee for the specific purpose set forth in this communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited, and you should delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. The recipient may not further distribute or use any of the information contained herein without the express written authorization of the sender. If you have received this message in error, or if you have any questions regarding the use of the proprietary information contained therein, please contact the sender of this message immediately, and the sender will provide you with further instructions. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: