[Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review

Wed Jan 12 16:47:28 UTC 2022

Dear Kevin,

 I understand Jean-Luc has some remaining problems. I need to talk to him on Jan 17 (first possible opportunity). Please bear with us until you get a consolidated reply.

 Regards,

 Enrico

   On Jan 12, 2022, 02:54:34, kevin.gifford at colorado.edu wrote:

  From: kevin.gifford at colorado.edu
  To: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int, Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int
  Cc: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net, peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov, Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr, bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov, raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov, dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov, jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov, Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr, sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov, shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov, victor.j.sank at nasa.gov, kevin.gifford at colorado.edu
  Date: Jan 12, 2022, 02:54:34
  Subject: Re: [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review

        Dear Enrico, Dear Ignacio - 

        Thanks again for your inputs for CESG Final Review of CCSDS-883-0-R-0 submitted on 15-Dec-2021.

        As the 10-Jan-2022 request for response has elapsed, I assume the dispositions are agreeable to all.

        I therefore propose that the CCSDS Secretariat move forward with CMC polling and publication.

        Please inform me, the CCSDS Secretariat, and the group on copy if any objections by Monday, 17-Jan-2022.

        Thanks again for the valued inputs.

        Kevin

    From: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
     Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 3:25 PM
     To: Issler Jean-Luc <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>; Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>; sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>
     Cc: Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int <Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; victor.j.sank at nasa.gov <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600 <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>; Ray Wagner <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>; Shames, Peter M (US 312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>; Moury Gilles <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>; Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
     Subject: Re: [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review 

          [Enrico: Please post on sls-rfm mailing list, thanks] 

          Dear Enrico, Dear Jean-Luc -  

          Thank you for your time and effort to provide SFCG and SLS-RFM review inputs to the SOIS-WIR CCSDS-883 document. 

          The updated document is attached, and the changes incorporated into the document are easily reviewable/verifiable via MSWord Track Changes. 

          -- All inputs, except the requested change below, from Enrico and Jean-Luc have been incorporated into the document verbatim, with some modifications solely for English grammar concerns. 

          ================================ 

          The SOIS-WIR WG rejects the RID to add the below  highlighted sentence in Paragraph-1 of Section 3.2.1 GENERAL: REQUIREMENTS 

      3.2.1      GENERAL REQUIREMENTS   This Recommended Standard does not provide any normative guidance in the frequency values of the permitted bands (in addition to the applicable SFCG PNT band to protect: 2483.5–2500 MHz) by the space systems using the wireless terrestrial standards covered in this book. Consequently, the following constraints on the frequency selection must be followed:  

          The rationale of the SOIS-WIR WG is that there is no need, and it is confusing to make this explicit single phrase statement when the rest of the document references SFCG 32-2R3 which has this explicit restriction.  Tables 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 in the CCSDS-883 document have this constraint as well. 

     ================================ 

     @Enrico, @Jean-Luc: Please review the attached document (easy to do with Track Changes) and let me know if there are any remaining concerns.  Please have your comments to me by 10 January 2022 (sooner would be great ;-). 

          If any questions, or if any discussion is needed, please let me know at your earliest convenience. 

          Sincere thanks again for your time to review! 

          Kevin 

     From: Issler Jean-Luc <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>
      Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:07 AM
      To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>; Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>; sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>
      Cc: Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int <Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; victor.j.sank at nasa.gov <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600 <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>; Ray Wagner <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>; Shames, Peter M (US 312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>; Moury Gilles <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>
      Subject: RE: [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review 

      Dear Kevin, dear all,   To answer to your question bellow, my comments previously sent are (1) the official consensus CNES position, and (3) my comments as a member of SLS-RFM.   Please, find also attached here a combined version, including the comments made so far by RFM members and the RFM chairman having in mind SFCG concerns as SFCG chairman. The updates proposed in this combined version are supported by each of the RFM members having issued comments. Please consider from now this combined version instead of the previous separate versions.    Very best regards   Jean-Luc      

        De : Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu> 
         Envoyé : mardi 14 décembre 2021 17:39
         À : Issler Jean-Luc <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>; Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int; sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
         Cc : Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov; shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov; victor.j.sank at nasa.gov; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600 <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov; Ray Wagner <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>; Shames, Peter M (US 312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>; Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
         Objet : Re: [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review 

       Dear Jean-Luc -  

       Thank you for your time to comment and provide inputs. 

       Please allow me to pose a clarification question: My understanding is that you are providing comments/inputs as a member of SLS-RFM, correct?  The reason I am inquiring is that in your comments below you are summarizing as "CNES comments" and I want to understand if your statement is: 

       (1) the official consensus CNES position, or,  

       (2) the official SLS-RFM position, or  

       (3) your assessment as a member of SLS-RFM?  

       I assume your statements are as a member of the SLS-RFM WG, please correct me if I am mistaken... 

       Thanks. 

       Kevin 

       From: Issler Jean-Luc <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>
        Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:56 AM
        To: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>; sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>; Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
        Cc: Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int <Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; victor.j.sank at nasa.gov <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600 <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>; Ray Wagner <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>; Shames, Peter M (US 312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
        Subject: RE: [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review  

        Dear all,    Please find here my comments as a member of RFM WG:   First Major comments:   -          The informative and normative materials of 883 shall be less vague vis a vis protection of Radio Astronomy in the Shielded Zone of the Moon, in order the implementer to have the proper level of essential information and requirements without needing to read a pile of documents, without not be required to protect one band having an influence on RA protection, and without having to wait at least years an eventual possible futur CCSDS complementary and relevant RFM document. CCSDS rules actually allows this proper level to be part of 883 thanks to a few lines only*.   -          The informative and normative materials of 883 shall be less ambiguous on standardising, when using an current SFCG band for a wireless link, the need to not have wireless channels spectrally outside (even partly) the said SFCG wireless band. CCSDS rules actually allows to avoid such an ambiguity in a CCSDS standard. If not, 883 would put in danger adjacent SFCG lunar bands to be used for links different than wireless, and this would be not good*.   * Similar comments (detailed in track changes in the attached version) were already taken into account by the Wireless WG which submited by consensus a “CESG-approuval”  version of 883 to CESG. Then, 4 PIDS broke this consensus, and CNES + DLR members of the Wireless WG informed the Wireless WG members about the consensus having been broken (and it is still the case up till now). The declared disposition of a significant number of CNES RIDS in the frame of 883 agency review is actually no more valid up till now. The new comments made in the attached version however propose a new compromise, without removing the fundamental goals related to RA in the SZM and the protection of SFCG non-wireless bands. It was said about this 883 version submitted to RFM that it has to not adress some frequency issues (rather “forward work to the implementing engineer”), but “MHz” appear 66 times (before CNES present comments) and “GHz” 82 times (before CNES present comments) !! CNES think that these 148 references to frequencies in the submited version are relevant in 883, as well as the very few aditional ones proposed by CNES to be re-introduced to recover the agreed consensus. Transfering most of these references into a future RFM document to be refered now in 883 as a future document, and to be published (eventually with the required solved ambiguities) in at least some years, would put more in danger Radio Astronomy in the SZM as well as some SFCG non-wireless bands. This would be not appropriate for CNES. CNES proposes the ambiguities to be removed now, as agreed by the Wireless WG which submited to CESG a 883 standard version without such ambiguities.      Other comments:   -          The title of the 883 standard could be improved by coping more with the content of the standard: Wifi and 3GPP  (while there are also optical and UWB wireless links which could be standardized later on by CCSDS). Without puting “Wifi and 3GPP” (or Wifi and 3GPP LTE) in the title, it would be as if (for instance) the DVB-S2 CCSDS space telemetry standard would be named only “VCM” in its title !   -          The relative velocity (Doppler) between the  transmitter and the receiver is mentioned to be taken into account; but, the relative acceleration (Doppler slope) is not mentioned to be also taken into account, as it shall be.   Have a nice day; Very best regards   Jean-Luc   De : SLS-RFM <sls-rfm-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> De la part de Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int
         Envoyé : lundi 6 décembre 2021 08:51
         À : sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
         Objet : [Sls-rfm] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review   For you consideration when submitting comments by Dec. 15. 

         Regards, Enrico 

         ----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 06/12/21 08:50 ----- 

         From:        "Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811)" <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov> 
         To:        "Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670)" <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov>, "Kevin K Gifford" <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>, "Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee]" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> 
         Cc:        "Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int" <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>, "Rodriguez, Shannon (GSFC-5670)" <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>, "Lee, Wing-tsz (GSFC-5670)" <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>, "Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee]" <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Sank, Victor J. (GSFC-567.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC]" <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>, "Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600)" <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>, "Wilmot, Jonathan J. (GSFC-5800)" <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>, "Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811)" <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov> 
         Date:        03/12/21 23:07 
         Subject:        RE: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review  

           Hi, all.  After coordinating with GSFC management today, SOIS-WIR agrees  to add the following statement to Sec. 1.3 Applicability of the copy of the document under review by SLS:   NOTE:  this book covers interoperability recommendations for Wi-Fi and 3GPP architectures.  It does not address recommendations specific to deployments in unique mission environments.  It is forward work for the implementing engineer to address, on a case-by-case basis, issues such as band selection, antenna selection, antenna placement, antenna elevation, cell site planning, network loading, mission criticality, backhaul, etc. to provide desired coverage and service for a specific mission.     This should disposition outstanding concerns and allow SLS to proceed with a review scoped to the “redlines” Kevin mentions below.   Kevin can follow up with a new document incorporating the above text, but the previous copy still serves to review the “redline” changes using change tracking as Kevin suggests below.   Thanks to all involved for identifying and resolving this issue today.    Ray       From: Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670) <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov> 
         Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 9:59 AM
         To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>; Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee] <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
         Cc: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int; Rodriguez, Shannon (GSFC-5670) <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Wing-tsz (GSFC-5670) <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; Sank, Victor J. (GSFC-567.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>; Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811) <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600) <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>
         Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review   Kevin,   One more thing, I thought from our SIG WG that you and Johnathan Wilmott agreed to notify of the first review.  I never got anything from either of you on that.   Regards,     Wai Fong, Ph.D. Communications Engineer Flight Microwave and Telecommunications Systems Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 567 Greenbelt, MD  20771         From: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
         Date: Friday, December 3, 2021 at 10:48 AM
         To: "Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670)" <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov>, "Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee]" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
         Cc: Enrico Vassallo <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>, Shannon Rodriguez-sanabria <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>, WING-TSZ LEE <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>, "Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee]" <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, Victor Sank <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>, "Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811)" <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>, "Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600)" <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>, Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
         Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review   Wai -    Thank you for the reply, as I stated previously, the document has already gone through Agency Review-01 and CESG review so this is not an entire document review request. Kevin 

         From: Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670) <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov>
         Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 8:41 AM
         To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>; Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee] <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
         Cc: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>; Rodriguez, Shannon (GSFC-5670) <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Wing-tsz (GSFC-5670) <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; Sank, Victor J. (GSFC-567.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>; Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811) <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>; Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600) <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>
         Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review    Kevin,   I’m only checking emails and the document’s over 100 pages long. 30 minutes would not be enough to even make sure the references were right.  Also, because of our center’s continuing problems with announcements for documents to be reviewed, we were never notified that that the first review ever took place.  So, if you want a thorough review from me, you have to give me the opportunity to do it.   Regards,     Wai Fong, Ph.D. Communications Engineer Flight Microwave and Telecommunications Systems Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 567 Greenbelt, MD  20771         From: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
         Date: Friday, December 3, 2021 at 10:36 AM
         To: "Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670)" <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov>, "Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee]" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
         Cc: Enrico Vassallo <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>, Shannon Rodriguez-sanabria <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>, WING-TSZ LEE <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>, "Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee]" <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, Victor Sank <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>, Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>, "Wagner, Raymond S. (JSC-EV811)" <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>, "Edwards, Bernard L. (GSFC-5600)" <bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov>
         Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review   Hi Wai -    I would like to get the document published ASAP.   The document has already gone through Agency Review-01 and CESG review so this is not an entire document review request.   Can you take 30 minutes and review the updates please?    Thanks.   Kevin     

         From: Fong, Wai H. (GSFC-5670) <wai.h.fong at nasa.gov>
         Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 8:29 AM
         To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>; Shames, Peter M (JPL-312B)[JPL Employee] <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
         Cc: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>; Rodriguez, Shannon (GSFC-5670) <shannon.rodriguez-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Wing-tsz (GSFC-5670) <wing-tsz.lee-1 at nasa.gov>; Lee, Dennis K (JPL-332G)[JPL Employee] <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>; Sank, Victor J. (GSFC-567.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] <victor.j.sank at nasa.gov>
         Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review    Kevin, Peter;   I’m on vacation this month but I would like to give this a proper review.  Can you delay the review deadline until mid or late January?   Regards,   Wai Fong, Ph.D. Communications Engineer Flight Microwave and Telecommunications Systems Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 567 Greenbelt, MD  20771         From: SLS-RFM <sls-rfm-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> on behalf of Enrico Vassallo <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>
         Date: Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 2:10 PM
         To: "sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org" <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>
         Cc: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu>
         Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review
         Resent-From: "Content-filter at st.scanss.org" <virusalert at scanss.org>
         Resent-To: <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>
         Resent-Date: Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 2:06 PM   Since Kevin is not a member of RFM WG, his emails are not forwarded by the RFM mailing list server. 

         Please review the attached document and let me have your comments by Dec 15 latest. 

         Regards, Enrico 
         ----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 02/12/21 17:25 ----- 

         From:        "Kevin K Gifford" <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu> 
         To:        "Jonathan Wilmot" <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>, "Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int" <Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int>, "dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov" <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int" <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>, "sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org" <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org> 
         Cc:        "Shames, Peter M (US 312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Ray Wagner" <raymond.s.wagner at nasa.gov>, "CCSDS Secretariat" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>, "Kevin K Gifford" <kevin.gifford at colorado.edu> 
         Date:        02/12/21 16:51 
         Subject:        CCSDS-883-R-0 CESG Request for final review  

         Dear Jonathan, Ignacio, Dennis, Enrico, SLS-RFM - 

         I have worked with Dr. Peter Shames to update CCSDS-883-0-R-0 to ensure SLS concerns are properly addressed per the CESG. 

         The attached CCSDS-883-0-R-0 document is a result of Peter and I's efforts to assuage any remaining concerns. 

         I am requesting that SLS reviews the updates to the document for consensus purposes. 
         -- All updates are tracked via "Track Changes" 
         -- A suggestion is to simply click "Next Change" to see the updates 
         -- The primary updates (sans editorial nits) are on pages 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-5, 3-1 and 3-2 

         @Jonathan: Please review and provide your acceptance or any remaining concerns at your earliest convenience. 

         @Igancio: Can you and SLS-RFM please review and provide your acceptance or any remaining concerns at your earliest convenience. 

         I believe that the review will take minimal time as Peter and I worked to ensure the updates would resolve SLS concerns expressed to the CESG. 

         Please let me know if any questions. 

         Thanks to all! 

         Kevin  This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int). 
        This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or 
        protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received 
        this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect 
        personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int). 

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20220112/29e8e19c/attachment.htm>