[Sls-rfm] closure of AI_19-11

[Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int]

Dear All,

here's the answer by Dennis, the actionee for AI_19-11.

I think we can close this action.

Regards, Enrico

----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 19/10/20 16:07 -----

From:   "Lee, Dennis K (US 332G)" <dennis.k.lee at jpl.nasa.gov>
To:     "Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int" <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>
Date:   19/10/20 12:34
Subject:        RE: [EXTERNAL] AI_19-11



Dear Enrico,
 
AI_19-11 was to find out why the frequencies in Ch 0 and Ch 4 were so 
close together.  The answer that I received was that these channel 
frequencies were chosen because they provided good BER results during 
Electra testing, and not in order to provide optimum frequency spacing 
between the channels.  I think that this is enough to close the action 
item.  I’ll submit an update to the draft recommendation at the Spring 
meeting.
 
I have a CDR coming up next week for another project I am working on.  So 
I am busy working on that, sometimes until 4 AM.
 
Regards,
Dennis
 
 

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20201019/8ac38b4c/attachment.htm>