[Sls-rfm] Final minutes of the RFM WG Fall 2020 meeting

Fri Nov 6 08:44:51 UTC 2020

Dear All,

thank you for agreeing with the draft minutes. I fixed a few editorials 
and added one person to the attendees list as requested.

The attached approved minutes have also been included in CWE.

Please complete your actions in time for the Spring meeting.

Stay healthy,

Enrico

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, "Volk, Christopher P (US 335D)" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov, Javier De 
Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA, Marco Lanucara/esoc/ESA at ESA
Cc:     "Thomas Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Date:   28/10/20 12:32
Subject:        Draft minutes of the RFM WG Fall 2020 meeting

Thank you all for agreeing with my proposed disposition and also for the 
additional changes suggested for REC 2.5.7B.

Using the draft disposition d2 updated by yesterday's developments, I 
generated the draft minutes of the meeting documenting our activities and 
decisions.

Please feel free to submit any comments for improvements/clarification by 
Nov 5. If I do not receive any comments by that date, I will assume WG 
concurrence.

Please note that I had some difficulties with the participants list. For 
the time being, it only includes the name of the persons that submitted a 
paper or a written comment or written response or an email on any of the 
agenda items.
If you participated in silent mode, meaning you agreed with everything and 
did not need to send any paper or email for that, and you want your name 
listed, please send me an email as soon as possible (latest by Nov 5).

I am going to cancel the videoconf planned for Oct 29. 

Later today I will send you all the agreed outputs.

Thanks for the very much appreciated cooperative approach,

Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM_Fall_2020_(Minutes)_i0.1.pdf" deleted by Enrico 
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov, "Volk, 
Christopher P (US 335D)" <christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Marco 
Lanucara/esoc/ESA at ESA, Javier De Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   26/10/20 09:08
Subject:        Fw: Comments to RFM WG Fall 2020 inputs - disposition d2

Dear All,

no comments were received so your concurrence with version d1 is noted. 
Please find attached d2 with the new text based on developments occurred 
meanwhile marked in cyan. The still open points awaiting action results 
are in yellow.

Hoping that Dennis can provide us with the revised REC 2.6.13 and that the 
C&S WG can reach consensus on VCM tomorrow, I give you time until tomorrow 
to raise any issue with the changes in d2.
Assuming you all agree, I will turn the draft disposition in the approved 
disposition on Oct 28. I will then proceed to cancel the VC on Oct 29.

Later today, I will check the charter and send you my proposal for changes 
to be endorsed also by tomorrow (we only have delays.)

I will also send you the revised REC 2.5.7B once I get the master from the 
secretariat. Next week I will prepare the minutes and all associated 
outputs.

Please let me know also by tomorrow, who wants to see his name listed as 
participant to this virtual set of meetings.

Regards, Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Fall 2020 Proposed Inputs Disposition)_d2.docx" 
deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 26/10/20 08:52 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov, "Volk, 
Christopher P (US 335D)" <christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Marco 
Lanucara/esoc/ESA at ESA, Javier De Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   21/10/20 17:27
Subject:        Fw: Comments to RFM WG Fall 2020 inputs - disposition d1

Dear All,

please find an updated draft disposition following latest developments. 
Again this is a living document until Oct 26 (see for instance the text in 
yellow highlght). 

If you have comments, do come back by Oct 26.

Regards, Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Fall 2020 Proposed Inputs Disposition)_d1.docx" 
deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 
----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 21/10/20 17:24 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc:     James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov, "Volk, Christopher P (US 335D)" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Marco Lanucara/esoc/ESA at ESA, Javier De 
Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   20/10/20 11:06
Subject:        Comments to RFM WG Fall 2020 inputs

Dear All,

by the deadline of Oct 19, the following set of comments were provided in 
writing and therefore will be considered by the WG:

1. Comments to SLS-RFM_20-02                            by NASA
2. Comments to SLS-RFM_20-06                            by ESA
3. Comments to SLS-RFM_20-07                            by NASA
4. Comments to SLS-RFM_20-09                            by ESA

5. Proposed reply on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1           by chair and deputy chair
6. Comments to proposed reply on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1       by CNES
7. Comments to CCSDS 883.0-BBv1                 by NASA

Comments 1-3 are all of clarification nature and could be addressed by a 
reply by the authors of the document or by an updated document. Authors 
may do this by Oct 26 or by taking an action item for next meeting.
Would the authors of these 3 documents indicate the preferred way forward?

Comments 4 concern a recommendation proposed to go to agency review so 
they should be answered before we proceed further. I am kindly asking 
Dennis to indicate by when he could reply and provide an updated 
recommendation version.

Document 5 has already been updated with relevant text from document 6 
focusing on SFCG and frequencies, and would be ready for submission to 
SOIS. However, the comments in document 7 would sort of block the CCSDS 
process of SOIS by requesting inputs to RFM WG.
This is a sensitive issue. Since the comments were generated by NASA, SOIS 
chair is from NASA, and some exchanges took place between SOIS chair and 
SLS RFM deputy chair also from NASA, I would kindly ask NASA to suggest an 
acceptable way forward to the RFM WG by Oct 26 latest.
More info on this but also on the other documents and on the on-going 
agency review (deadline for RIDs is today) can be seen in the attachment, 
which is a living document until it is approved by the WG at the end of 
next week.

Should you also have different interpretations from me on the input 
documents disposition in the attachment, please feel free to let me know 
by Oct 26.

The way I see the received WG inputs and comments, I think we can proceed 
by correspondence and avoid the teleconf tentatively planned for Oct 29. 
Of course, I need to see if more RIDs are submitted to the agency review 
before the end of the day and if they invalidate my reasoning.

Please let me have your views on my proposed disposition and reply on the 
planning questions I raised.

Regards, Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Fall 2020 Proposed Inputs Disposition)_d0.docx" 
deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 19/10/20 16:05 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Date:   13/10/20 13:29
Subject:        RFM input papers list for Fall 2020

Please submit your comments in writing to the inputs latest by Oct 19.

Regards, Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Fall 2020 Input Papers List) i1.0.docx" deleted by 
Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20201106/750fdaeb/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SLS-RFM_Fall_2020_(Minutes)_i1.0.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 175547 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20201106/750fdaeb/attachment-0001.obj>