[Sls-rfm] CCSDS RFM-DDOR WG remote discussions - proposed conclusions for RFM WG endorsement

[Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int]

Dear All,

the input papers concerning draft recommendation 2.5.7B for the Spring 
2020 meeting and the relevant comments received in writing by May 5 
resulted in an in-depth discussion by correspondence between me and Dennis 
with Giovanni's help for the RFM WG, and Jim and Christopher for the DDOR 
WG.

The results are the response document that responds in details to all 
issues raised and the W-4 (GB-EV-JB) version of REC 2.5.7B. Additionally, 
two consequential changes have been agreed by the correspondence group for 
REC 2.5.6B which got the pre-PINK name.

I believe that all raised questions have been responded to (except the PN 
register convention that we agreed to work off line in parallel to the 
agency review of REC 2.5.7B). However, I would like everyone to check the 
attached 3 documents and confirm that his/her issues have been solved 
satisfactory.

In light of the urgency with this (see extract from our AD email below), I 
would kindly ask you to provide me with any disagreements or suggestions 
for improvement you may have by next  Friday, June 26 (close of business 
anywhere you live on Earth.)
If I do not receive any such inputs by June 26, I will submit the 2 
recommendations below to the AD for requesting agency review along with 
what PINK REC 3.1.6B agreed already in Fall 2019. REC 2.5.7B will have all 
revision marks removed and REC 2.5.6B will be called simply PINK.

Best Regards, Enrico






______________________

Dear All, 
        I think that some WGs reported planned resolutions to trigger 
Agency Review. 
In this respect please keep in mind that Fall 2020 Meetings is planned to 
start on 26 October. 
Therefore consider that the following (minimum) timing requirement 
a)  One month for CESG + CMC Polls (longer if there are conditions) 
b) Two months for Agency Review. 

This means that - in case you want the agency review closing e.g. mid 
October - the CESG Poll shall start mid July latest. 
And if you want to consider that the CCSDS Technical Editor will need some 
time to check and adapt your docs for the poll then better... hurry up! 

Regards 

Gian Paolo




This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200622/b0f6eaaf/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Response PN DOR Input Papers and Comments Rev 2-June.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 192036 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200622/b0f6eaaf/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2.5.7.B-W-4 (GB-EV-JB).docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 278918 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200622/b0f6eaaf/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pre-PINK REC 2.5.6B.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 138477 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200622/b0f6eaaf/attachment-0005.obj>