[Sls-rfm] 401x0rp293_CESG_Approval.pdf

[Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int]

Dear Gian Paolo, Gilles and Tom,

at Gian Paolo's request I went through this document and I found a 
problem. The issue has nothing to do with Tom's editing. It was there 
(unnoticed) since the input paper was submitted to the RFM WG, discussed, 
amended and turned into a WG output.

Having checked with Dennis, I can confirm that it is only applicable to 
the editorially modified recommendation 2.4.7 and its recommends (1) that 
reads as:

(1)        that for modulation schemes which use a subcarrier, the 
subcarrier to bit rate ratio should be an integer; 

Now in the spirit of the editorial changes introduced in the other 
sections of rec 2.4.7, this should instead be written as;

(1)        that for modulation schemes which use a subcarrier, the 
subcarrier to coded symbol rate ratio should be an integer; 

I trust that you have no problem with the suggested editorial change and 
that Tom can implement it before going for CMC approval.

Best Regards, Enrico


This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200113/a19f802e/attachment.htm>