[SLS-CC] C&S Spring "meeting"

[Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int]

Dear colleagues,

this is the list of inputs I've received for the Spring meeting (I didn't 
compile an actual agenda, it doesn't make much sense).

C&S/RFM
- VCM (NASA)                                    (SLS-CS_20-01) we should 
be able to discuss it via emails and call a telco only if required. Please 
copy RFM WG, this is a joint matter
- Proposal for simulation channel model (ESA)   Not urgent, delayed until 
the next meeting

C&S only
- TC coding Green Book                  We should be able to process this 
via emails and call a telco for discussion, if needed
- TC coding Blue Book                           We may need a telco for 
discussion
- Standarding PN shift registers... (NASA)      (SLS-CS_20-02) I assume 
email discussion will be sufficient, but I would need to see the input 
first to be sure
- Revision of TM coding Blue Book...(NASA)      (SLS-CS_20-03) Let's start 
by email discussion and see if telco is needed

- Allowable links/codes/modulations/directions (NASA)   I'm not sure how 
to treat this input. Given the title, it seems it affects RFM WG as well 
so it shouldn't be treated as C&S item only.
                                                        I suppose a 
decision will be taken once the input is avaible so that we can better 
classify it. 

My propoposal is the following: inputs should be provided by the original 
deadline (Monday 20 April), as if the meeting would take place normally.
Then, I would recommend that we discuss via email to tha largest possible 
extend, sending comments to the inputs byt the original start date of the 
meeting (4 May).
Probably we'll manage to close some of the points via email, while for 
others we'll need further discussions. In such cases, I will propose 
ad-hoc telcos that I will organize based
on the identified needs.
I will not be able to hold such remote meetings, at a time reasonable to 
all potential participants, during the week originally allocated for the 
CCSDS meeting, so I will propose alternative, later dates.
I hope this way of handling the meeting can be acceptable to all WG 
members

For the joint with RFM/SLP/OPT about the OPT proposal on GFP, I am of the 
opinion that such a discussion should be delayed until a face to face 
meeting is actually possiblle. 

Kind regards,
Massimo



---------------------------------------------------
Massimo Bertinelli
Communication Systems Engineer
ESA/Estec

Tel. +31 (0)71 5653435
--------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-cc/attachments/20200406/148de705/attachment.htm>