[Sis-exec] Quick straw poll of SIS WG Chairs

[Durst, Robert C.]

Scott Burleigh pleads for the ability to provide a non-binary response.
If the spirit so moves you, feel free to inflict your response on a
scale of 0 to 10.  And if you care to provide some insight into your
scoring criteria, that would be great also.
 
Thanks,
Durst 


________________________________

	From: sis-exec-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:sis-exec-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Durst, Robert
C.
	Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:31 AM
	To: sis-exec at mailman.ccsds.org
	Subject: [Sis-exec] Quick straw poll of SIS WG Chairs
	
	
	Hi.  Peter Shames is going to want to get "closure" with me on
my comments on the RASDS (Reference Architecture for Space Data
Systems) document (revised version is attached).  My comments on the
previous version are also attached.  
	 
	The goal of RASDS (I believe) is to standardize a way of
representing protocols and services so that system architects may then
combine the products of our WGs into interoperable end-to-end systems.
	 
	Here's the question:  If this were an approved document, would
it provide any value? I would like to provide a consensus statement of
all of the SIS WG chairs to Peter sometime (relatively early) this
week.
	 
	Thanks,
	Bob
	 
	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-exec/attachments/20060612/38e61d2d/attachment.htm