[Sis-dtn] NULL report-to EID in bundle primary block is ok?

[Robert C Durst]

That’s my recollection of the CCSDS take on the use of the NULL EID.

 

Best,
Bob

 

From: SIS-DTN <sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Ed Birrane via SIS-DTN
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2026 11:53 AM
To: SIS-DTN WG <sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [EXT] [Sis-dtn] NULL report-to EID in bundle primary block is ok?

 

Felix, At the CCSDS meetings we had some discussion related to the BP pink sheets, specifically as relating to the use of the NULL EID in a bundle primary block. I believe we agreed that anonymous bundles (e. g. bundles with a NULL source EID)



Felix,

 

  At the CCSDS meetings we had some discussion related to the BP pink sheets, specifically as relating to the use of the NULL EID in a bundle primary block.

 

  I believe we agreed that anonymous bundles (e.g. bundles with a NULL source EID) should be rejected, but that bundles with a NULL report-to EID may be accepted. But, wanted to confirm that was the sentiment in the room.

 

-Ed

 

— 

Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D.

Chief Technical Officer, Founder

Tolero Networks

443-690-1117

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20261027/8fe0dbd8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 7604 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20261027/8fe0dbd8/attachment.bin>