[Sis-dtn] DTN input to SIS report to CESG

[sburleig.sb at gmail.com]

Hi, Tomaso.  My sense is that as of Thursday the DTNWG had tentatively agreed that procedures for bundle segmentation and reassembly should be added to BIBE to address known problems with BP fragmentation/reassembly.  Bob, was that your sense?   If so, should we hold up on the BIBE Orange Book or let it go ahead for now and work on pink sheets (or maybe apricot sheets) for the additional procedures?

 

Scott

 

From: SIS-DTN <sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Tomaso de Cola via SIS-DTN
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 12:53 PM
To: durst at mitre.org
Cc: sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Sis-dtn] DTN input to SIS report to CESG

 

Hi Bob, 

 

Thank you for the slides and for great progress!

 

Just a question for my understanding, we have two orange books projects about network management, one dealing with the architecture (I.e. based on RFC 9675, amp I-D, etc) that Ed and Brian shared a few weeks ago. Then there is a second one about the DTN management information, which is more about ODM/ADM. From your report I understand only the latter was discussed, or am I wrong?

Concerning BIBE I see we are ready for publication, shall I issue a resolution for the CESG poll? In such a case I’d like first to review myself the book.

 

Regards,

 

Tomaso

Sent from my iPhone





On 13. Jun 2025, at 21:38, Robert C Durst <durst at mitre.org <mailto:durst at mitre.org> > wrote:

 

Tomaso,

 

Slides attached.

 

All,

 

Whew!  What a great week!  Thank you to everyone for your hard work and commitment!

 

Best,

Bob

<d01-CESG Spring 25 DTN.pptx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20250614/040f4dc7/attachment.htm>