[Sis-dtn] proposed BPv7 Blue Book revision

[Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de]

Hi all,

Just for the sake of the clarification, if we are going to make any changes to the spec not linked to any of the RIDs raised in the agency review happened more than one year ago, we must then go to a new agency review. In this process IESG is not involved.

Regards,

Tomaso
Sent from my iPhone

On 17. Aug 2025, at 12:27, sburleig.sb--- via SIS-DTN <sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org> wrote:


Hi.  As we discussed on Thursday, the following text is proposed as an edit in response to the current IESG (?) review of the BPv7 Blue Book draft:

In view of the identified problems with BP fragmentation and reassembly, any bundle primary block that contains a fragment offset value shall be considered a malformed block.

(According to Step 3 of 5.6, this will result in deletion of the bundle.)  Comments?

Scott
_______________________________________________
SIS-DTN mailing list
SIS-DTN at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sis-dtn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20250818/adb1178f/attachment.htm>