[Sis-dtn] [EXT] RE: SIS-DTN G Resolution to submit the attached draft Red Book to the CESG for polling for agency review.

Wed Jul 27 14:13:43 UTC 2022

Ok I'll modify it accordingly.

Thank you for the ack.

Tomaso

From: Dr. Keith L Scott <kscott at mitre.org>
Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2022 16:13
To: Cola, Tomaso de <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>
Cc: suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp; beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov; sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [EXT] RE: SIS-DTN G Resolution to submit the attached draft Red Book to the CESG for polling for agency review.

Good catch on point 1; we can reference rfc9172.

  Keith

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de> <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 4:13:39 AM
To: Dr. Keith L Scott <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>
Cc: suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp<mailto:suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp> <suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp<mailto:suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp>>; beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov<mailto:beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov> <beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov<mailto:beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov>>; sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org> <sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: [EXT] RE: SIS-DTN G Resolution to submit the attached draft Red Book to the CESG for polling for agency review.

Keith,

I've just gone through the document and looks ok to me. Only two points:

  1.  In the note immediately after 5.2.1, I read "The convergence layer service interface specified here is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. That is, supplementary DTN protocol specifications (including, but not restricted to, the Bundle Protocol Security [BPSEC])"

*       Should it be (BPSEC) instead of [BPSEC] or was the intention to point a BPSEC reference? In the latter case, we can put RFC 9172 between brackets as we also did in other parts of the document.

  1.  Being a revision of an existing book, very likely this should be a pink rather than a red book (affecting in any case only the first pages of this document). I'll check in any case with Tom.

Thank you for clarifying point 1).

Regards,

Tomaso

From: Dr. Keith L Scott <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>
Sent: Dienstag, 26. Juli 2022 00:42
To: Cola, Tomaso de <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>>
Cc: Kiyohisa Suzuki <suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp<mailto:suzuki.kiyohisa at jaxa.jp>>; Blanding, Beau T. (MSFC-HP27)[HOSC SERVICES CONTRACT] <beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov<mailto:beau.t.blanding at nasa.gov>>; sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: SIS-DTN G Resolution to submit the attached draft Red Book to the CESG for polling for agency review.

Tomaso,

The SIS-DTN working group has developed and come to consensus on the attached draft Red Book as an update to the Bundle Protocol.  The WG resolves to submit this to you as the SIS Area Director for your review as the next step towards releasing the book for Agency Review.

Attached is the source text for the document and a PowerPoint slide containing the figures from the book.

                                                v/r,

                                                --keith

Dr. Keith Scott

L110 Chief Architect, Advanced Networking for Assured Communications

Office:    703.983.6547

Cell:        301.437.4472

Email:     kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>; keith.scott at mitre.ctr.nro.ic.gov<mailto:keith.scott at mitre.ctr.nro.ic.gov>

The MITRE Corporation<http://www.mitre.org/>

M/S J500

7596 Colshire Drive

McLean, VA 22102

MITRE self-signs its own certificates.  Information about the MITRE PKI Certificate Chain is available from https://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20220727/71117255/attachment-0001.htm>