[SIS-CFDPV1] final (I hope) test plan document

[구철회]

Hi, Scott.

It seems the Test Plan document is getting complex as the CFDP specification is getting revised.
Please find my comments as follow:
 1) as the CFDP specification is revised, especially checksum handling perspective, now 3.1 (checksum types) can be merged with 3.6 (mandatory checksum algorithms) because these section are mentioning the validation of checksum algorithm implementations. My suggestion is to remove 3.1, and to add CRC test case in 3.6.
2) as now CFDP specification allows checksum type selection when a transaction starts rather than getting one from MIB, 3.2 (closure requests) has to define a default checksum type, e.g. modular, for conducting following test cases.
3) the condition code for 3.7.2 shall be ‘1011’ rather than ‘11’

That’s all what I got here now after a very short review. I will get back to here when I get more.

Best,

Cheol


From: SIS-CFDPV1 <sis-cfdpv1-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B) via SIS-CFDPV1
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 7:58 AM
To: sis-cfdpv1 at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [SIS-CFDPV1] final (I hope) test plan document

Hi.  I just now posted to CWE a new Test Plan document for the CFDP Revisions that I believe is final.  Over the next couple of days I will be plugging interoperability testing results into that Plan to turn it into a Report, which I hope to send to Tom Gannett very soon.

Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-cfdpv1/attachments/20200305/26127e26/attachment.htm>