From peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov Thu Oct 20 11:33:56 2016 From: peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov (Shames, Peter M (312B)) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:33:56 +0000 Subject: [SEA-XSG] SANA Steering Group meeting Message-ID: <5FB87E31-FF1E-46CA-83EE-B288A92FDC35@jpl.nasa.gov> Dear SSG (& XSG), We do have a SANA Steering Group (SSG) meeting on the schedule for Friday, 21 Oct, starting at 1330 in Rm 13. I hope that is good luck. ;-} The primary focus is going to be on SSG topics, including a report from the SANA operator and a discussion of the work being done to re-engineer the SANA registries to align with the recently published RMP. There has been a lot of excellent work done by the SANA operator and they will (I believe) be showing us what they have accomplished. Since there has been no additional progress on any XSG topics, and there is effectively no assigned resource, I am at the point of suggesting that we just close this effort. This means we will have no defined XML guidelines. If someone feels strongly that this is not the course to take speak up now. Thanks, Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at sanaregistry.org Thu Oct 20 13:31:13 2016 From: info at sanaregistry.org (Marc Blanchet) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:31:13 -0400 Subject: [SEA-XSG] [SSG] SANA Steering Group meeting In-Reply-To: <5FB87E31-FF1E-46CA-83EE-B288A92FDC35@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <5FB87E31-FF1E-46CA-83EE-B288A92FDC35@jpl.nasa.gov> Message-ID: <1E93FC13-C822-4E2A-A59D-35F65A34B60B@sanaregistry.org> On 20 Oct 2016, at 7:33, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote: > Dear SSG (& XSG), > > We do have a SANA Steering Group (SSG) meeting on the schedule for > Friday, 21 Oct, starting at 1330 in Rm 13. I hope that is good luck. > ;-} > > The primary focus is going to be on SSG topics, including a report > from the SANA operator and a discussion of the work being done to > re-engineer the SANA registries to align with the recently published > RMP. There has been a lot of excellent work done by the SANA > operator and they will (I believe) be showing us what they have > accomplished. yes. > > Since there has been no additional progress on any XSG topics, and > there is effectively no assigned resource, I am at the point of > suggesting that we just close this effort. at the very least, the URN work has been done and we got it! ;-) Marc. > This means we will have no defined XML guidelines. If someone feels > strongly that this is not the course to take speak up now. > > Thanks, Peter > _______________________________________________ > SSG mailing list > SSG at mailman.ccsds.org > https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ssg