From james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov Thu Jun 25 12:12:22 2026 From: james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov (Lux, Jim (US 430E)) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:12:22 +0000 Subject: [SEA-TIME] Paper on high performance clocks in space for VLBI Message-ID: <284C35E6-6A62-41A0-83AC-EB1C84336F10@jpl.nasa.gov> Goes into a fair amount of detail on characterization and requirements. Should be open access, but if you have trouble getting a copy, let me know. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025RS008476 Since its observation in 2019, the first image of a super-massive black hole using Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) with an Earth-scale baseline has generated much scientific and public interest. Work is now underway to extend the baseline into space to obtain higher image resolution. Operating one or more VLBI nodes in space will require the use of frequency standards that are space-qualified, greatly reducing the number of options available. The coherence function is the metric usually used to determine the viability of a frequency standard. Here we show that is a useful but not sufficient metric for gauging frequency standard performance in VLBI and instead derive an expression for the clock-limited VLBI visibility S/N. We evaluate this expression for real frequency standards and find only the Ultra-Stable Oscillator (USO) and hydrogen maser to be viable for upcoming high-frequency VLBI with the USO only useful for very limited integration times (30 seconds at 90 GHz, 10 seconds at 230 GHz, 5 seconds at 345 GHz, and not viable at 630 GHz). The maser extends these, but may have prohibitive size for a space mission. We also evaluate emerging frequency standard technologies and find the optical local oscillator portion of optical clocks to be very promising (conservatively >100 seconds at 90 GHz, 60 seconds at 230 GHz, 40 seconds at 345 GHz, and 22 seconds at 630 GHz) when accounting for both performance and potential operation in space. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: