[Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
Howard.Weiss at parsons.com
Mon Apr 24 16:02:29 UTC 2017
The problem is that the next review of this document will be in 5 years! The Cross Support section has been in the document since the first version in the "how does security effect" section.
Even with a revision to the CSTS work in progress, I would tend to believe that the security effects should be apparent.
Howard Weiss, CISSP
7110 Samuel Morse Drive
Columbia, MD 21046
howard.weiss at parsons.com
Please consider the environment before printing this message
From: Dorothea Richter <dorothea.richter at dlr.de>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 7:34 AM
To: Shames, Peter M (312B)
Cc: Weiss, Howard; sea-sec at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
Peter - thanks for this clarification. Seems that there is some confusion in
the CSTS WG about their own planning...
Do you have any idea about the timeline for this FF-CSTS Service?
I absolutely agree that it would make sense to have a discussion with them.
Regarding our GB, I would propose the following:
If it still takes some time for the CSTS WG to start working on this FF-CSTS
topic (and hence even more time to publish it), we leave CSTS out of chapter
6.3 of the GB by now, so that we are able to finish the review. But: We should
not forget to mention it in the next revision.
Otherwise, if they plan to publish their FF-CSTS Service in the near future,
we should be able to sort out (together with the CSTS WG) what is relevant for
chapter 6.3 and include it in the GB:
Howie - what do you think?
More information about the SEA-SEC