[Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
Shames, Peter M (312B)
peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Apr 24 14:55:15 UTC 2017
The CSTS WG has a draft WB at this point, and there is a person assigned to work on it (Tim Pham) one of our JPL guys, but it needs more work. I think it's in pretty good shape, but I do not think that it will be mature enough to prototype until next year.
That said, I think it would be good to talk to them now about potential issues, but it may not be timely to include it in your spec. Please check with Tim and Erik to see what they think.
From: Dorothea Richter <dorothea.richter at dlr.de>
Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 at 4:34 AM
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Howie Weiss <Howard.Weiss at parsons.com>, SEA-Sec <sea-sec at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
Peter - thanks for this clarification. Seems that there is some confusion in
the CSTS WG about their own planning...
Do you have any idea about the timeline for this FF-CSTS Service?
I absolutely agree that it would make sense to have a discussion with them.
Regarding our GB, I would propose the following:
If it still takes some time for the CSTS WG to start working on this FF-CSTS
topic (and hence even more time to publish it), we leave CSTS out of chapter
6.3 of the GB by now, so that we are able to finish the review. But: We should
not forget to mention it in the next revision.
Otherwise, if they plan to publish their FF-CSTS Service in the near future,
we should be able to sort out (together with the CSTS WG) what is relevant for
chapter 6.3 and include it in the GB:
Howie - what do you think?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SEA-SEC