[Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
Howard.Weiss at parsons.com
Fri Apr 21 14:03:25 UTC 2017
And I apologize for interpreting the action item incorrectly since I thought it was to write a section for the appendix.
If you think there is nothing more to add to 6.3 then could you take a look at the existing section and update it?
Howard Weiss, CISSP
7110 Samuel Morse Drive
Columbia, MD 21046
howard.weiss at parsons.com
Please consider the environment before printing this message
From: SEA-SEC <sea-sec-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> on behalf of Dorothea Richter <dorothea.richter at dlr.de>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 8:58 AM
To: Weiss, Howard
Cc: sea-sec at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Sea-sec] Action Items from Rome Fall 2016 Meetings - CSTS
thanks a lot for the two mails you sent me - and sorry for not beeing more
presice in the one I sent on Wednesday.
You`re absolutely right - and this was also what I remembered from the Rome
meetings: my action is to review section 6.3.
Until now, in this section we only talk about the influence of applying
security (either SDLS or higher layer security) on SLE services. I was
wandering if there would also be an influence on CSTS services, so I proposed
to write a chapter about this as well.
But after what I learned from the CSTS books and from my colleague (being the
fact that they are not planning a CSTS service for TM/TC/AOS frames) I`m not
sure any more if talking about CSTS in chapter 6.3 makes sense at all.
What do you think?
SEA-SEC mailing list
SEA-SEC at mailman.ccsds.org
More information about the SEA-SEC