[MOIMS] Fw: [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results - MOIMS Charters

[Nestor.Peccia at esa.int]

Please your feedback asap
ciao
nestor
----- Forwarded by Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA on 06/03/2007 08:25 -----
                                                                             
             Neil Dissinger                                                  
             <neild at aiaa.org>                                                
             Sent by:                                                     To 
             cesg-all-bounces at m         CESG-all                             
             ailman.ccsds.org           <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>, CMC    
                                        <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org>              
                                                                          cc 
             06/03/2007 01:48                                                
                                                                     Subject 
                                        [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results - MOIMS  
                                        Charters                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             




CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2007-02-001: Authorization to
approve updates to MOIMS DAI, IPR, NAV and SM&C Charters

Results of CMC poll beginning 15 February 2007 and ending
2 March 2007:

                 ADOPT: 5 (83.33%) (BNSC, CSA, INPE, JAXA,
NASA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 1 (16.67%) (CNES)
                REJECT: 0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

      CNES: CNES fully agrees with the charters of DAI,
IPR and SM&C and will continue activities in these groups.

Nevertheless in the DAI, CNES will provide a replacement
for Claude Huc who retires mid-2007 in terms of his
participation to the works but not as a co-chair of the
WG.

On the NAV WG, CNES requests the following clarifications
and confirmation:
- the goal related to DDOR should be reformulated and
should clearly identify the objectives in terms of
production : the goal cannot be to support a SIG which is
a temporary structure.
- confirm the DDOR production refering to ODM is part of
the on-going activities conducted with SC-14 for the
enhancement of this BB ; if not, the schedule should
reflect an additional milestone or deliverable.
- confirm the DDOR production refering to TDM was already
part of the RB-2 and is currently under review ; if not,
the schedule should reflect an additional milestone (note:
in this case, refer to IOAG statement that urges for the
production of a TDM BB and places DDOR in second priority)
- confirm that neither the activities conducted with the
DDOR SIG, nor those with the CSTS, cover the definition of
the DDOR correlator output ; if not confirmed, please
clarify which production is expected in which group and if
the NAV, update the goals, schedule and deliverables.
- last goal is not acceptable as too imprecise.
- clarify if the TDM and ADM implementation tests in 2007
are assumed to cover XML interface or if XML will only be
tested in 2008.


      JAXA: It is better to correct the manner of writing
for each charters.
Because there are some differences in same subjects among
each charters.
For example,only DAI charter shows resource requirement.
MOIMS charter says dates of telecon in the schedule.


      NASA: For the SM&C and NAV charters, NASA fully
supports.

For the DAI and IPR charters, NASA agrees to support in
accordance with the schedule on the charters through
October 2007. NASA has reservations about these efforts,
and at the October 2007 meeting, NASA will review the
products and status of the working groups and decide
whether the NASA funded support will continue in these
areas. Therefore, the schedule dates that follow October
2007 have some risk.


Results are based on responses from 6 out of 10 members
(60%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
DLR
ESA
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Pending Disposition of
Provisions

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

_______________________________________________
CESG-all mailing list
CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all