[Moims-sc] MO Mission Data Product Distribution Services

[Smith, Danford S. (GSFC-5800)]

Michele,

I will be interested to hear your thoughts in Darmstadt.

I would hope that the Mission Data Product Distribution Service would work regardless of the product type or format.  There may be a hundred or more different file formats and new missions may each have several unique products.

I would not expect the Product Distribution Service to actually generate any products.  Its job is to distribute them.  Other services may exist for the product generation.

If we assume it is a file distribution service, then users can subscribe to different file types, indicate how often they want files provided, identify missing files in their own list and request those, ask what is available, etc.  I would assume there is an authorization process that occurs prior to a new request being honored.

I am not sure that our working group needs to define the formats for inside each of the file types.

Dan


=========================
Dan Smith
NASA/GSFC
Code 580
Bldg 23, Room E443
8800 Greenbelt Road
Greenbelt, MD  20771
301-286-2230
Dan.Smith at nasa.gov<mailto:Dan.Smith at nasa.gov>

From: moims-sc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:moims-sc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Michele Zundo
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int
Cc: moims-sc at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Moims-sc] MO Mission Data Product Distribution Services

Dear Mehran,

thanks for this.

One high level comment regards the scope for such service, which covers in
your draft type of data coming from M&C type of systems but leave out the
“real” mission data, “mission" being the end-product of the mission i.e. science products and related data
either downloaded on payload link or produced by payload data processing canters

I believe that we should include in the scope of this service not only TT&C TM (packets, parameters, etc)
but also science and related data e.g. as formatted file products (level 0, Level 1 etc).
We have already working practice and formats description standards and we
should make sure that we define service in a generic way so that we can support that
 as well.

I can elaborate more during the meeting in November.

Michele



On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:36 , Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int<mailto:Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int> wrote:

<MDPDS.pptx>

-----------------------------------------
Michele Zundo

Head of Ground System Definition and Verification Office
EOP-PEP
European Space Agency, ESTEC
e-mail: michele.zundo at esa.int<mailto:michele.zundo at esa.int>









This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20151027/efc95ce1/attachment.html>