[MOIMS-NAV-EXEC] FW: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...

Daniel Oltrogge dan at comspoc.com
Fri May 14 22:13:02 UTC 2021


Alain and Julie –

My review comments for the ADM attached.

Also see discussion below FYI.

Dan

Dan Oltrogge ҉ Director, Integrated Operations and Research ҉ COMSPOC Corporation  ҉ 719-482-4552 ҉ dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>

From: Berry, David S (US 3920) <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>
Sent: May 14, 2021 16:08
To: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...

Dan:

Perhaps fair game for a discussion with the WG on 05/24, but from my point of view, the intent was to use the value in the Abbreviation column. That's consistent with past practice, and the technical penchant for acronyms.

The downside is that you've probably observed that more than half of the "Abbreviation" values are null in that registry...

David



From: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>>
Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 at 3:00 PM
To: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...

Yep, I’d already seen that it’s the same in the ODM, and already changed it (in a follow-on version to what I’d sent earlier today) to the full name.

Question is:  What is the right answer?

Dan Oltrogge ҉ Director, Integrated Operations and Research ҉ COMSPOC Corporation  ҉ 719-482-4552 ҉ dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>

From: Berry, David S (US 3920) <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Sent: May 14, 2021 14:51
To: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...


See screen shot...


From: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>>
Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 at 1:32 PM
To: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...

Figure D-8 (where ever JAXA is mentioned).

Dan Oltrogge ҉ Director, Integrated Operations and Research ҉ COMSPOC Corporation  ҉ 719-482-4552 ҉ dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>

From: Berry, David S (US 3920) <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Sent: May 14, 2021 14:21
To: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...


Dan: apologies for not understanding. I'm not finding the issue in the ADM P1.11 document. Can you point me to a page reference where you observe this?

Thx


From: Daniel Oltrogge <dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>>
Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:28 PM
To: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Cc: Lamy Alain <Alain.Lamy at cnes.fr<mailto:Alain.Lamy at cnes.fr>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Question on SANA Organization...

David –

I discovered in my ADM review that the “Organization Name” for JAXA is its full name (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency), whereas an abbreviation of JAXA is listed.

Does this mean that JAXA can be used in the message for organization, or is the message creator supposed to enter the full name?

Dan

Dan Oltrogge ҉ Director, Integrated Operations and Research ҉ COMSPOC Corporation  ҉ 719-482-4552 ҉ dan at comspoc.com<mailto:dan at comspoc.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-nav-exec/attachments/20210514/40e41107/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 504x0p1.11_CRM_Dan.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 48647 bytes
Desc: 504x0p1.11_CRM_Dan.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-nav-exec/attachments/20210514/40e41107/attachment-0001.docx>


More information about the MOIMS-NAV-EXEC mailing list