[Moims-ipr] New version of DEDSL answer

[Don Sawyer]

Patrick,

You are certainly right about the "attribute_value_example" being an 
example of an attribute value, not an entity value.  I have no problem 
with  your reformulation of the answers.

You also mentioned, at the telecon, that you were going to comment on 
his Dictionary.  Are you still intending to do this?  I look forward to 
your comments on it.

Don

On Mar 1, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Mazal Patrick wrote:

> Please find attached the last version of our answer to Peter Füzi 
> comments on his DEDSL experience, as I intend to send him on behalf of 
> our group, after the telecon we had yesterday.
>
> You will notice that about question 3, although we did not raise the 
> issue yesterday, I suppressed the sentence about 'value_example' which 
> said "We think the existing 'value_example', which provides 8000 
> characters to describe the element, should answer most needs". My 
> understanding is that "attribute_value_example" is a descriptor for a 
> user attribute and, as such, allows to give an example of the 
> attribute value, not of an entity value. Am I wrong ?
>
> Please feel free to make any correction to the proposed answer.
>
> As we proposed also yesterday,  I will add in my message to Peter an 
> invitation to attend our Thursday and Friday IPR meeting in Athens 
> where we should address possible evolutions of the DEDSL (in 
> particular the composite structure naming and inheritance which is 
> raised by question 2) and the XML schema DEDSL orientation.
> Waiting for your comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
>
> <answer2.doc>_______________________________________________
> Moims-ipr mailing list
> Moims-ipr at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-ipr