[Moims-dai] SEC WG notes

[david at giaretta.org]

Thanks Mike. 

I think there has been a misunderstanding if he thinks we are only
"concerned with high level attributes such as data provenance and data
access" 

I don't think we said we would add security directly to our standard, but
could add pointers to, say, REST security.

But perhaps I am misremembering the conversation.

What do other say?

 

..David

 

From: MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Mike
Kearney via MOIMS-DAI
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 8:48 PM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: kearneysolutions at gmail.com
Subject: [Moims-dai] SEC WG notes

 

The Security Working group issued their minutes for the spring meeting, and
they included this note:  

 

12.	Data Archiving Interoperability (DAI): While not 'officially' a
joint meeting, Howie Weiss attended the Data Archiving Working Group based
on Chuck Sheehe's questions regarding security for data at rest. Currently
the data archiving group is concerned with high level attributes such as
data provenance and data access.  Their existing documents allude to
security, mostly from an access control and integrity perspective, but do
not mandate mechanisms to provide security. DAI agrees that they need to
gain more specificity and detail to provide protection of data provenance.
We had a good discussion, provided DAI with some security concepts to think
about, and will continue to be in contact.  

 

 

   -=- Mike

 

Mike Kearney

Huntsville, Alabama, USA 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20230602/d2acd7c2/attachment.htm>