[Moims-dai] FW: Results of CESG Polls closing 29 January 2020

[david at giaretta.org]

This is the email I received about OAIS - I thought I had sent this around
previously.

Instead of the OAIS document as an attachment you can find it at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oagaydtagrzq8ni/650x0020_CESG_Aproval.doc?dl=0 

..David

-----Original Message-----
From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
Sent: 03 February 2020 17:26
To: david at giaretta.org
Cc: Peter.M.Shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 29 January 2020

Resending with correct address.

David:

The CESG poll to approve release of CCSDS 650.0-P-2.1, Reference Model for
an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (Pink Book, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS
Agency review concluded with conditions. Please negotiate disposition of the
conditions directly with the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions and
CC the Secretariat on all related correspondence.

The Word file used to create the CESG Approval copy is attached and should
be used to make modifications nessesitated by resolution of the poll
conditions.



>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
>CESG-P-2019-12-008 Approval to release CCSDS 650.0-P-2.1, Reference 
>Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (Pink Book, Issue 
>2.1) for CCSDS Agency review Results of CESG poll beginning 31 December 
>2019 and ending 29 January 2020:
>
>                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari) Approve Unconditionally:  
>3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot) Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) 
>(Shames) Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>
>     Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):   The improvements to 
> the document from the past version are useful and add clarity.  That 
> said, there are a large number of issues with this document that 
> really must be addressed.  It asserts that it defines "conformance 
> criteria" for digital archives, but in reality these are extremely 
> weak. It has a significant section that describes an abstract 
> functional and information architecture, but this plays no part in 
> "conformance".  It discusses interoperable OAIS archives, but misses 
> the opportunity, by making modest improvements to the "functional and 
> information architecture" to provide even an abstract framework for 
> understanding how to create such systems.
>
>     Gian Paolo Calzolari (Abstain):  COMMENT: I find rather strange 
> that there i no Normative Reference in this book. Can you confirm this 
> is correct?
>
>     Jonathan Wilmot (Approve Unconditionally):   Comments may be 
> offered during agency review process
>
>
>Total Respondents:  5
>
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>
>     CSS
>
>
>
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
>conditions have been addressed
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CESG-P-2019-12-007_PID_650x0-SEA-v1.txt
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20200211/80d3b86a/attachment-0001.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CESG-P-2019-12-007_PID_650x0-SEA-v1a.txt.rtf
Type: application/rtf
Size: 42287 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20200211/80d3b86a/attachment-0001.rtf>