[Moims-dai] [EXTERNAL] Reminder of Skype call today
Hughes, John S (398B)
john.s.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Apr 30 13:38:54 UTC 2019
Hi all,
Sorry I will not be able to attend. The Insight mission has a looming deadline and I have a couple of action items.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 30, 2019, at 4:43 AM, David Giaretta <david at giaretta.org<mailto:david at giaretta.org>> wrote:
Meeting: 10:00 Tuesday (EST), 1500 UK time, 1600 European time
Join it by clicking the link:
https://join.skype.com/ykyu5SIPhSnD
*Don't have Skype yet? Download it before you join https://www.skype.com
General schedule:
Tuesday of the month
Activity
Technical Editor(s)
1st
ISO 16363 Audit and Certification Metrics
John Garrett, David Giaretta
2nd
IPELTU Info Preservation Enabling Long-Term Usage
David Giaretta
3rd
OAIS-IF DAADD OAIS Interoperability Framework – Digital Archive Architecture Design Doc
Steve Hughes
4th
OAIS-IF and reports on OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks
5th
OAIS-IF and reports on OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks
Draft agenda this week (5th Tuesday of the month):
1. Brief report on status of OAIS v3 draft – I made my last, minor, edits to OAIS – marked in the comments with “20190425”. Also added a summary of changes to the document history. The following link is to the Word file which has all comments including references to review.oais.info<http://review.oais.info>: https://cwe.ccsds.org/moims/docs/MOIMS-DAI/OAIS-related/OAIS-v3/OAIS%20final%20v3%20draft%20with%20changes%20wrt%20OAISv2%2020190425.docx?Web=1
A PDF with simple mark-up is at:
https://cwe.ccsds.org/moims/docs/MOIMS-DAI/OAIS-related/OAIS-v3/OAIS%20final%20v3%20draft%20with%20changes%20wrt%20OAISv2%2020190425.pdf.
I plan to send docs to MOIMS AD immediately after the meeting.
1. Preparation for CCSDS plenary
2. OAIS-IF status
3. IPELTU status
4. RASIM status
5. ISO16363 review
Suggested Change ID
Product
Component
Summary
Explanation of the reason for the suggested change
Reporter
Category of change
44
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Identifiers - Submetrics (4.2.4.1.x) – Can the five metrics be combined?
These submetrics seem to be much more detailed than most submetrics.
steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov>
Recommended change for other considerations
45
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
Identifying and managing risks - Submetrics (5.1.1.1.x) - Can the eight metrics be reduced to two?
These submetrics seem to be much more detailed than most submetrics.
steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov>
Recommended change for other considerations
48
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities
The second mandatory responsibility, “Obtain sufficient control of the informationâ€, is mentioned twice in the metrics, as the focus of metric 4.1.6 and as supporting text for metric 3.5.1.1. However an assessment of the metrics found that this responsibility had the second highest number of supporting metrics. Is there some way to make this fact more clear and to align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities described on the OAIS Framework? [1]
[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016. http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/
steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov>
Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts
49
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Revise or update language in metrics to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements
Generally, revise or update language in metrics, including explanation, discussion, and examples for selected metrics to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements in data management practices, including any revisions that will be made to the Mandatory Responsibilities and other areas described within the CCSDS OAIS Framework, the CCSDS DAI draft on Information Preparation for Long-Term Use, practices recommended in the Group on Earth Observations’ Data Management Principles and Implementation Guidelines, recommendations in the Research Data Alliance’s Data Management Trends, Principles and Components – What Needs to be Done Next?, the Global Climate Observing System’s current revisions to the Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC, Common Framework for Earth Observation Data, DSA–WDS Core Certification and its Catalogue of Common Requirements, FAIR Principles, and the Belmont Forum EÂInfrastructure and Data Management: Implementation Plan. [1]
[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016. http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/
steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:steve.hughes at jpl.nasa.gov>
Identification of any outdated material
119
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Changes to ensure updated ISO 16363 is consistent with updated OAIS
This is a catch-all comment to ensure that this standard is consistent with OAIS (ISO 14721).
david at giaretta.org<mailto:david at giaretta.org>
Recommended change for other considerations
244
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.1.2.1 Questions to address
These questions may arise in some audits
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
245
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.1.2.2 Questions to address
Questions that could arise in some audits.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
246
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.2.1.3 Add to Examples of Evidence
Provides additional examples of how to meet criteria
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
247
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.3.1 and 3.3.2 Address issue of "general public" as part of Designated Community
Many archives have general public as customers, but there can be problems if they are included in Designated Community.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
248
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.3.2.1 Add discussion of staff needs
Staff knowledge is an important element for adopting and enforcing policies.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
249
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.3.4 Transparency vs. other needs
For many criteria, there is often not a single concern, but there is a need for balance between competing requirements.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
250
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 3 : Organisational Infrastructure
3.5.1 and 3.5.1.1 Add evidence of legislation as example of way to meet criteria
Many archives preserve data because they are legally required to do so.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
251
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
5.1.1 Delete unmatched closing paren
Editorial
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Editorial
252
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
5.1.1 Scaling largest systems will likely result in major disruptions
Ensure we are clear what is required and how it relates to determining risks.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts
253
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
How do 5.1.1.1.2 and 5.1.1.1.3 differ?
Seems to be a lot of overlap. Not sure criteria are properly stated.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts
254
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
5.1.1.1.4 Seems to require blank check for hardware updates
Blank checks for updates are not feasible.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
255
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
How do 5.1.1.1.6 and 5.1.1.1.7 differ?
Perhaps these should be collapsed or perhaps rewritten to more clearly indicate the distinct focus.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts
256
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 5 : Infrastructure and security risk management
5.1.1.1.8 Seems to require blank check for software updates
Unrealistic to expect committed funding for any future software updates.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
257
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Add sub-metrics to 4.2.3
Seems like several sub-metrics could be added. If not, then
metric and sub-metric could be combined.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts
258
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Restate 4.2.1 criteria
Simplifies criteria.
By definition all AIPs are to be preserved by the repository, so we don't need to include that in the criteria.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Editorial
259
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
4.2.1 Definition of AIP does not help to find the AIP
Definition of AIP does not help to find the AIP
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Corrections to matters of fact
260
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
Switch 4.2.1.1 and 4.2.1.2
Makes more sense to talk about the AIP description before saying that an AIP needs to be linked to that description
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Editorial
261
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
4.2.1.2 Allow descriptions for class of AIPs
The same definition should be adequate for a whole class of AIPs.
The definition should deal with all components of that AIP whether they are required components or not.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Updates needed for clarification
262
Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
Section 4 : Digital Object Management
4.2.1.2 Rewrite Supporting Text
AIP descriptions do not alone provide all the services (or possibly any of the services) mentioned in the supporting text.
garrett at his.com<mailto:garrett at his.com>
Corrections to matters of fact
Regards
..David
_______________________________________________
MOIMS-DAI mailing list
MOIMS-DAI at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:MOIMS-DAI at mailman.ccsds.org>
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20190430/aea0da8f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the MOIMS-DAI
mailing list