[Moims-dai] FW: CDO text

Tue Apr 2 21:35:48 UTC 2019

Before the change you had to provide PDI for the Content Data Object and
the Representation Information. Now you only have to provide PDI for the
CDO. How is that better? more complete?

Mark Conrad
NARA Information Services
Systems Engineering Division (IT)
The National Archives and Records Administration
Erma Ora Byrd Conference and Learning Center
Building 494, Room 225
610 State Route 956
Rocket Center, WV  26726

Phone: 304-726-7820
Fax: 304-726-7802
Email: mark.conrad at nara.gov

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:22 PM david <david at giaretta.org> wrote:

> Not the way I, and others, read the changes.
> David
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mark Conrad <mark.conrad at nara.gov>
> Date: 02/04/2019 22:17 (GMT+00:00)
> To: MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
> Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] FW: CDO text
>
> " As I pointed out in the Skype call, surely the Archive does indeed need
> to preserve things like Fixity Information, otherwise how could the Archive
> provide evidence that the CDO has not changed from what the Producer
> provided or to what the CDO may be Transformed into at some point."
> -Agree
>
> " Without the change it is possible to think that OAIS has nothing clear
> to say about preserving such things."
>
> -Disagree. The suggested change to have PDI (including Fixity) apply only
> to the CDO rather than all of the Content Information actually makes it
> less clear about what PDI (including Fixity) should be preserved. The
> change requires less PDI rather than more to be preserved.
>
>
> Mark Conrad
> NARA Information Services
> Systems Engineering Division (IT)
> The National Archives and Records Administration
> Erma Ora Byrd Conference and Learning Center
> Building 494, Room 225
> 610 State Route 956
> Rocket Center, WV  26726
>
> Phone: 304-726-7820
> Fax: 304-726-7802
> Email: mark.conrad at nara.gov
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:57 PM David Giaretta <david at giaretta.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Don
>>
>>
>>
>> Without wanting to open up the extremely voluminous email exchange that
>> we had last year off-list, I cannot resist responding to your last
>> paragraph, which you write as if the aim is bad!
>>
>>
>>
>> I, and others, want to make the change so that it becomes extremely clear
>> how an Archive should preserve, for example, Fixity Information, if the
>> Archive chooses to preserve it. As I pointed out in the Skype call, surely
>> the Archive does indeed need to preserve things like Fixity Information,
>> otherwise how could the Archive provide evidence that the CDO has not
>> changed from what the Producer provided or to what the CDO may be
>> Transformed into at some point. Without the change it is possible to think
>> that OAIS has nothing clear to say about preserving such things.  All
>> pretty useful things.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> ..David
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> *On Behalf Of *D
>> or C Sawyer
>> *Sent:* 02 April 2019 19:47
>> *To:* MOIMS DAI List <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Moims-dai] FW: CDO text
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
>>
>> There is no valid reason to change the Content Information definition
>> from ‘the original target of preservation’ to ‘a target of preservation’.
>> This has been there from the beginning to make clear it is referring to the
>> original information provided by the Producer and not just any information
>> within the Archive.  This is important to ensure that when people are
>> discussing preservation within an OAIS context, everyone understands this
>> is the information originally provided by the Producer.
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course we understand why you want to make this change because you
>> still want to move Content Information to being ANY information in the
>> Archive so you can claim the whole process is recursive by definition ‘and
>> been there from the beginning'.  This would be a radical, ambiguity
>> enhancing,  change to the long standing common understanding of the OAIS
>> information and functional modeling.  For these reasons this proposed
>> change should be thoroughly rejected by the group.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers-
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:06 AM, David Giaretta <david at giaretta.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* David Giaretta <david at giaretta.org>
>> *Sent:* 02 April 2019 13:12
>> *To:* 'Mark Conrad' <mark.conrad at nara.gov>; 'John Garrett' <
>> garrett at his.com>
>> *Subject:* CDO text
>>
>>
>>
>> My suggestions for the additional text:
>>
>>
>>
>> Change in current draft from:
>>
>> *Preservation Description Information (PDI*): The information, which
>> along with Representation Information, is necessary for adequate
>> preservation of the Content Data Object and which can be categorized as
>> Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity
>> Information, and Access Rights Information.
>>
>> Note: Defining PDI (as well as its components - Provenance Information,
>> Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access
>> Rights Information) as relevant to the Content Data Object does not mean
>> that those concerns are any less important for other data objects or at
>> other levels, for example, it is important to apply reference, fixity,
>> provenance, context and access rights to Representation Information, or to
>> any other information the Archive is preserving. Definition of these terms
>> as relevant to the Content Data Object is simply to ease discussion of
>> these concepts at the Content Data Object level.
>>
>>
>>
>> To:
>>
>> *Preservation Description Information (PDI*): The information, which
>> along with Representation Information, is necessary for adequate
>> preservation of the Content Data Object and which can be categorized as
>> Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity
>> Information, and Access Rights Information.
>>
>> Note: Defining PDI (as well as its components - Provenance Information,
>> Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access
>> Rights Information) as relevant to the Content Data Object does not mean
>> that those concerns are any less important for other data objects or at
>> other levels, for example, it is important to apply reference, fixity,
>> provenance, context and access rights to Representation Information, or to
>> any other information the Archive is preserving. Definition of these
>> terms as relevant to the Content Data Object is simply to ease discussion
>> of these concepts at the Content Data Object level.
>>
>>
>>
>> I suggest deleting the last sentence because it does not make sense to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Change
>>
>>
>>
>> *Content Information*: A set of information that is the original target
>> of preservation. It is an Information Object composed of its Content Data
>> Object and its Representation Information.
>>
>> To
>>
>> *Content Information*: A set of information that is a the original target
>> of preservation. It is an Information Object composed of its Content Data
>> Object and its Representation Information.
>>
>> There are a few other places the change “the original” to “a” would also
>> be needed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Add to the end of section 4.2.1.4 Taxonomy of Information Object Classes
>> Used by OAIS
>>
>> Content Information is any Information Object which is being preserved by
>> the Archive.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t know an easy way to put this into the UML diagram.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also add the end of section 4.2.1.4.1 Content Information:
>>
>> Any Information Object being preserved by the Archive, such as
>> Representation Information, PDI etc., may also be considered to be Content
>> Information.
>>
>>
>>
>> ..David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MOIMS-DAI mailing list
>> MOIMS-DAI at mailman.ccsds.org
>> https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MOIMS-DAI mailing list
>> MOIMS-DAI at mailman.ccsds.org
>> https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MOIMS-DAI mailing list
> MOIMS-DAI at mailman.ccsds.org
> https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20190402/76cf1035/attachment-0001.html>