[Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture

[John Garrett]

Hi,

 

That sounds good to me.

I agree that OAIS Architecture sounds too much like it is a required
architecture to be OAIS compliant. 

It also then starts to be misunderstood as required to be certified.

 

However OAIS-Interoperability Framework sounds less like a requirement and
more like a desirable feature that archives would want.

 

Peace and joy,

-JOhn  

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
David Giaretta
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 1:22 PM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture

 

Would it be better to call the new work an OAIS Interoperability Framework
(OAIS-IF)

 

..David

 

From: MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> > On Behalf Of Mike Kearney
Sent: 11 March 2018 03:29
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: [Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture

 

DAI WG members:  After last Tuesday's discussion, I realized that we have an
issue at least with terminology for the new architecture effort.  So I'm
attaching a short writeup for your reading pleasure and discussion during
the next telecon.  

 

The main points you should take away from this discussion are:  

*        The use of the term "OAIS Architecture" should not be considered
intended to change anything about the OAIS Reference Model or certification
thereof, and;

*        If use of the term "OAIS Architecture" make people think it will
change OAIS, then maybe we need a new term.  

 

I would prefer to stick with "OAIS Architecture," but we can discuss other
options.  

 

   -=- Mike

 

Mike Kearney

Huntsville, Alabama, USA

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20180311/8721e549/attachment.html>