[Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture
garrett at his.com
Sun Mar 11 19:07:39 UTC 2018
That sounds good to me.
I agree that OAIS Architecture sounds too much like it is a required
architecture to be OAIS compliant.
It also then starts to be misunderstood as required to be certified.
However OAIS-Interoperability Framework sounds less like a requirement and
more like a desirable feature that archives would want.
Peace and joy,
From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 1:22 PM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture
Would it be better to call the new work an OAIS Interoperability Framework
From: MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> > On Behalf Of Mike Kearney
Sent: 11 March 2018 03:29
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: [Moims-dai] OAIS and the OAIS Architecture
DAI WG members: After last Tuesday's discussion, I realized that we have an
issue at least with terminology for the new architecture effort. So I'm
attaching a short writeup for your reading pleasure and discussion during
the next telecon.
The main points you should take away from this discussion are:
* The use of the term "OAIS Architecture" should not be considered
intended to change anything about the OAIS Reference Model or certification
* If use of the term "OAIS Architecture" make people think it will
change OAIS, then maybe we need a new term.
I would prefer to stick with "OAIS Architecture," but we can discuss other
Huntsville, Alabama, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MOIMS-DAI