[Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

[Mike Kearney]

Looks good to me.  

 

   -=- Mike

 

Mike Kearney

Huntsville, Alabama, USA

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
David Giaretta
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:28 PM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

Hi John 

 

My point was that the organisation of meetings and telecons happens through
the mailing list - joining the list is the way to participate.

I suggest

 

"If you wish to participate in the discussions of the suggested changes to
OAIS and ISO 16363, please join the MOIMS_DAI mailing list at
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai. This mailing
list will be used to co-ordinate discussions and meetings."

 

..David

 

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
John Garrett
Sent: 27 July 2016 19:22
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

Hi,

 

I would like the opportunity to perhaps sign up new long term participants
who might show up physically at meetings.

I  think we have enough people who can only participate in telecons.  I
don't think that impresses the CESG and CMC much.   I also think that having
some people who participate only in telecons could allow greater disruptions
than someone who would actually be committing more resources to physically
participate.  That being said, I also would still allow someone who would
only participate remotely.  Many of our current members participate only
that way and they make great contributions.  Too bad that we even need to be
concerned about disruptors.

 

Looking back at your message, I see you were talking about mailing list more
than telecons.  Less chance to really be a pain on just the mailing list.

 

But as I said above, I think we need to recruit more  physical participation
to remain a viable CCSDS WG.  That's my view.  Mike  may be in a better
position to comment on how CESG and CMC sees us.

 

Wishing you prosperity and peace,

-JOhn

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
David Giaretta
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:45 AM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

John

 

Could we just point out that people can join the MOIMS-DAI mailing list?
That will allow them to take part in all the discussions.

 

..David 

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
John Garrett
Sent: 27 July 2016 02:54
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

Hi,

 

I think that we should keep the paragraph inviting possible participation in
the update work.  I know we will have an update group, but we need to reach
out and encourage new participation in this group.

 

It is possible that we may be inviting disruptors, but we were all the new
disruptors once.  This paragraph was in the call when we distributed before
the last update 10 years ago and it didn't result in that many new
participants.  Many potential disruptors won't have resources behind them.
And most disruptors don't have enough interest to continue participating
when the other participants hold the line on what we expect the standard to
be and on what CCSDS has approved.  And a failsafe that we have is that
officially in CCSDS, their home nation's Space Agency needs to approve their
participation.

 

Another reason is that we want the ISO review to not bring up any new
comments.  We want  all the comments and problems coming up during
development of the CCSDS version.  It causes real problems to have an
approved CCSDS issue and then have to create a new issue (even for minor
changes) due to comments only coming in during the ISO review.  During the
ISO review, we can't really prevent anyone from participating since the
comments come in through any ISO country's review.

 

Wishing you prosperity and peace,

-JOhn  

 

 

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
Mike Kearney
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1:12 PM
To: 'MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

Comments attached.  Mostly editorial.  Sorry to have found more comments
after our long discussion this morning.  David, you should keep or toss them
as you see fit, no need for further discussion.  

 

   -=- Mike

 

Mike Kearney

Huntsville, Alabama, USA

 

From: MOIMS-DAI [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
David Giaretta
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:50 AM
To: 'MOIMS DAI List' <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
<mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Subject: [Moims-dai] Final draft of notification

 

Last comments by COB today. I'll send out the final version to this list
tomorrow.

 

..David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20160727/8a9b0a15/attachment.html>