[Moims-dai] Re: Comments of Rosenthal's "Case for a revision of OAIS"

John Garrett garrett at his.com
Mon Feb 22 16:12:24 UTC 2016



Yes, that could be.  Perhaps it was Rothenberg who was involved back then.

The participants lists for many of the early meetings were available.

Maybe I can go back and check.

But the participation may have just been from significant comments and not
from physical participation.


Thanks for the correction.


Wishing you prosperity and peace,



From: moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Mike Martin
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:09 AM
To: moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] Re: Comments of Rosenthal's "Case for a revision of


Hi John

On 2/22/2016 12:52 AM, John Garrett wrote:

I  believe the author has been involved in some of the earlier OAIS meetings
and discussions.  As I recall, he was very oriented towards emulation as the
way to go for preservation and was unhappy with the migration vs. emulation
treatments in the current OAIS.

Aren't you thinking of Jeff Rothenberg, "Emulation as a Digital Preservation

Thanks, Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20160222/23519c40/attachment.html>

More information about the MOIMS-DAI mailing list