[Css-csts] RE: Updated MD-CSTS on CWE

Wed Apr 9 14:46:15 EDT 2014

Margherita,
What you propose if fine with me. My concern was to minimize any delay on the release of the CSTS SFW red-2 book.

Regarding Yves' comments, he has also sent me an email asking if I have seen the  comments that he sent on Monday, but for some reason I did not receive them. Yves, please sent them to me again.

I am still on vacation (in Brussels) but I will be returning home tomorrow and back in work on Wednesday. I will look at Yves's comments and fix the typo that you found, and give an assessment of how long it will take me to make any necessary corrections. Hopefully it will only be on the order of a few days at most. However, I would also like to know what changes Wolfgang is going to be making and whether they will affect the MD-CSTS book.

Best regards,
John

From: Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int [mailto:Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 6:23 AM
To: John Pietras
Cc: CCSDS_CSTSWG (css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org)
Subject: Re: Updated MD-CSTS on CWE

Dear John,
I was wondering if we can follow another approach:
- given that the MD CSTS book is ready except for, say, another two weeks for the WG to make a final assessment and
- given that the CSTS SFW has just been recalled by Wolfgang, in order to fix few thighs that were raised during the Spring Meetings (so it is still being processed)
 - can't we submit also the MD CSTS to Secretariat, say by mid-May? I mean that, if Erik agrees, we could assess with Secretariat what is the waiting time for processing this new book. If this is a reasonable time, then we could put on-hold the begin of the Review process for CSTS SFW until MD CSTS gets processed, and so start at the same time the Review for both books, CSTS SFW and MD CSTS. This would be very useful for all Reviewers , as they would have means  to assess, at the same time, the Framework and the first Service built on top of it.
Do you see any reason for not doing so?

@ Erik: what is your opinion?

However, before proceeding with MD CSTS , can you let me know if you have included in this last version Yves' comments from 7th April (at a first glance it seems not).
(Finally, one small typo: in page 4-5, the reference 4.5.1.1.1 should read 4.5.3.1.1.1)

Kind regards,
Margherita

-------------------------------------------------------------
Margherita di Giulio
Ground Station Back-end Section (HSO-GIB)
European Space Agency ESA/ESOC
Robert-Bosch-Str. 5
D-64293 Darmstadt - Germany
Tel: +49-6151-902779
e-mail: Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int<mailto:Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int>

From:        John Pietras <john.pietras at gst.com<mailto:john.pietras at gst.com>>
To:        "Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int<mailto:Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int>" <Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int<mailto:Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int>>,
Cc:        "CCSDS_CSTSWG (css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>)" <css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Date:        08/04/2014 23:33
Subject:        Updated MD-CSTS on CWE
________________________________

Dear Margherita,
As of last week's meeting in Noordwijkerhout, the members of the WG had not had a chance to review the MD-CSTS to assess its readiness to be recommended for Red-1 review. No decision was made as to when the book review might be completed. However, we did discuss the possibility that once we agreed to send the book "up the chain" that we could post it in a public CWE folder that CSTS SFW Red-2 reviewers could read to give some context to the review of the Framework book. In any case, some decision need to be made about how soon the CSTSWG needs to review the MD-CSTS.

In the meantime, I found a few typos on the v0.20 draft of the MD-CSTS. Also, while updating the TD-CSTS book, I realized that the section titled "Managed Information" should really be called "Configuration Parameters", since the purpose of the section is to identify how the various configuration parameters that are delegated by the CSTS SFW to the derived services to let them determine how they are to be configure (e.g., by management or to values fixed by the service specification itself). We discussed this change in the WG meeting and the change was agreed.

I have placed an updated copy of the MD-CSTS that contains these typo fixes and the change from "Managed Information" to "Configuration Parameters" on the CWE at URL
http://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-CSTS/CWE%20Private/Future%20Services%20using%20Toolkit/MonitoredDataCSTS/MonitoredDataCSTS_W-0.21.doc

Best regards,
John

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

________________________________
NOTE: This message was trained as non-spam. If this is wrong, please correct the training as soon as possible.
Spam<https://filter.gst.com/canit/b.php?i=01LLKp4ed&m=6a44709e7251&c=s>
Not spam<https://filter.gst.com/canit/b.php?i=01LLKp4ed&m=6a44709e7251&c=n>
Forget previous vote<https://filter.gst.com/canit/b.php?i=01LLKp4ed&m=6a44709e7251&c=f>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20140409/e6f68d9e/attachment.htm